World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Marange diamond fields

Article Id: WHEBN0020661579
Reproduction Date:

Title: Marange diamond fields  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Human rights in Zimbabwe, Blood diamonds, Blood diamond, Mutare, Economy of Zimbabwe
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Marange diamond fields

Marange diamond fields are roughly 90km south west of Mutare in the eastern border province of Manicaland.
Marange diamond fields are roughly 90km south west of Mutare in the eastern border province of Manicaland.
Location of the Marange diamond fields roughly 90km south west of Mutare.

The Marange diamond fields are an area of widespread small-scale diamond production in Chiadzwa, Mutare West, Zimbabwe. 'Although estimates of the reserves contained in this area vary wildly, some have suggested that it could be home to one of the world's richest diamond deposits'.[1] The hugely prolific fields are regarded by some experts as the world's biggest diamond find in more than a century.[2] Production from Marange is controversial due to ongoing legal wrangles and government crackdowns on illegal miners and allegations of forced labour. In terms of carats produced, the Marange field is the largest diamond producing project in the world, estimated to have produce 16.9 million carats in 2013, or 13% of global rough diamond supply. Marange is estimated to have produced 12.0 million carats in 2012, 8.7 million carats in 2011, and 8.2 million carats in 2010. [3]


From the early 1980s, De Beers held an Exclusive Prospecting Order (EPO) over Marange via their subsidiary Kimberlitic Searches Ltd. Their EPO expired in 2006 and exploration rights were taken up by British-registered African Consolidated Resources.[4][5] Production from Marange is controversial due to ongoing legal wrangles and government crackdowns on illegal miners. In December 2006, the company was readying trial mining operations when the Government of Zimbabwe took over the rights via the Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation, despite African Consolidated Resources winning a court case allowing them to continue mining.[6]

In April 2010 the High Court of Zimbabwe ruled that the government could sell diamonds from Marange as it dismissed an application from British-based African Consolidated Resources to stop diamond sales from the disputed fields.[7]

In September 2010, the Zimbabwe High Court formally revoked a ruling from a year earlier that restored mining rights to British-based, African Consolidated Resources Plc.[8]

As of February 2014, the diamond fields are operated by 7 private entities all of which are partnered with the Zimbabwe government under the affiliate Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation (ZMDC). All 7 of the private companies are allegedly affiliated with Zimbabwe ex-military or political officials. The 7 companies currently operating are: Marange Resources, Anjin Investments Ltd., Diamond Mining Company, Gyn Nyame Resources, Jinan Mining Ltd., Kusena Diamonds, and Mbada Diamonds. [9]

Mineral rush

A mineral rush began in September 2006, but accelerated following the government take-over. By mid-December 2006, around 10,000 illegal artisanal miners were working very small plots at Marange, and an immediate water, sanitation and housing crisis developed. The miners initially sold their diamonds to the government, but a black market rapidly developed, offering better prices.[10]

Involvement of Zimbabwe government officials

Although the official plan was for the government to mine at Marange, in practice mining has been carried out to the benefit of senior government and Zanu-PF officials and those close to them, with little income returned to the government.[4][11] Speaking anonymously, a Harare-based diplomat said

A lot of leaders of the political regime are involved in trading. They have their own diggers and traders. But it's all to their personal account. They've all got a vested interest in chaos.[4]
By late 2008, mining was being carried out by soldiers, using local villagers for forced labour. The soldiers occasionally pay the villagers with diamonds and surrender much of the produce to their senior officers. According to one soldier interviewed by IRIN:
As a soldier, just like most people in this country, I am poorly paid and my salary can hardly see me through three days of a month... Our superiors back in the barracks are fully aware of what we are doing, and they let us continue because they benefit from this illegal mining of the diamonds. Every week, we surrender a substantial amount of the mineral to them.[12]

Government crackdowns

The government launched police crackdowns against illegal miners and smugglers several times since December 2006. In response to a call by the World Diamond Council for a clampdown on smuggling,[13] in November 2008 the Air Force of Zimbabwe was sent, after some police officers began refusing orders to shoot the illegal miners.[14] Up to 150 of the estimated 30,000[15] illegal miners were shot from helicopter gunships. In 2008 some Zimbabwean lawyers and opposition politicians from Mutare claimed that Shiri was the prime mover behind the military assaults on illegal diggers in the diamond mines in the east of Zimbabwe.[16] Estimates of the death toll by mid-December range from 83 reported by the Mutare City Council, based on a request for burial ground, to 140 estimated by the (then) opposition Movement for Democratic Change - Tsvangirai party.[4][14] The military operation, known as Operation No Return, also involved searching travellers into and out of the Mutare West area, with people found in possession of foreign currency or diamonds being detained and being forced to fill in holes on the diamond fields.[17]

On 28 January 2009, the government announced plans to resettle some 4,700 villagers from Chiadzwa to the 12,000 ha Transau Farm, on the Odzi River. Although Manicaland Provincial Governor Christopher Mushohwe said that the move had the full support of the local traditional leaders,[18] Chiadzwa villagers protested the resettlement.[19]


The BBC, the British state broadcaster, claims Zimbabwe's security forces have a torture camp in the Marange diamond fields;[20] methods include severe beatings, sexual assault and dog mauling according to alleged victims.[20]

International response

Zimbabwe is a participant in the Kimberley Process (KP), that regulates trade in diamonds,[17] although by June 2007 the KP annual plenary stated that it

noted with concern the continuing challenges to KP implementation in Zimbabwe and recommended further monitoring of developments and concerted actions in that respect.[13]

The Global Witness, the coalition said

the Kimberley Process (should) suspend Zimbabwe from the rough diamond certification scheme, in light of recent violence used by the government to take control of the Chiadzwa diamond fields.[6]

On November 5, 2009, however, the Kimberley Process conducted its annual meeting in Namibia and decided against the suspension of Zimbabwe. Instead, it recommended and then implemented with the compliance of the Zimbabwean government a 12-month working plan to monitor diamonds mined from the Marange field. The plan is aimed towards preventing exports curbing illegal digging, stopping smuggling of diamonds from Marange, better securing the area, improving the accounting and auditing of Marange diamonds, and supervising exports from the mine.

Many NGO’s came out in support of the plan, while others protested it as shielding Zimbabwe’s alleged grave human rights abuses. The Rapaport Group, chaired by Martin Rapaport, went so far as to ban traders on its internet diamond trading network from trading any diamonds from the Marange fields.[21]

Towards the end of 2009, it was claimed that Marange diamonds were being smuggled out of Zimbabwe through Mozambique.[22]

On May 6, 2010, the KP Chair reminded all participants that they should maintain vigilance to ensure that Marange diamonds comply with the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme. The five-page notice[23] also included photographs and descriptions of rough diamonds from the Marange fields: "On first sight, strong 'gravel' impression resembling rounded pebbles in a riverbed. Look like tumbled and abraded coarse chips of broken beer bottles with colours ranging from dark brown to black to darkish green. Most surfaces are matt (sic) and dulled with rounded corners and edges. Broken surfaces display 'metallic-like' lustre." The report also contains photographs showing Marange diamonds in various stages of processing, so they can be recognized if they are mixed in with a legitimate diamond export.

In July 2010 the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme agreed that diamonds from Marange could be sold on the international market[24][25] after a report from the Scheme's monitor a month earlier described diamonds mined from the fields as conflict-free.[26]

Sale of Marange Diamonds

In 2010 Zimbabwe's High Court ruled that the government could sell Marange diamonds. International pressure group Global Witness warned Zimbabwe against selling diamonds until the government complied with plans agreed with diamond monitors, the Kimberley Process to reform mining at Marange.[7] In June 2010 the Kimberley Process monitor appointed to review procedures and conditions at Marange reported that, "Based on evidence provided by the government of Zimbabwe and private investors, and on...first-hand assessment of the situation, Zimbabwe has satisfied the minimum requirements of the KPCS for trade in rough diamonds".[27]

In September 2010, the Zimbabwe High Court formally revoked a ruling from a year earlier that restored mining rights to British-based, African Consolidated Resources Plc.[8]

In August 2010 Zimbabwe resumed the sale of diamonds from the Marange fields. On August 11, buyers flew into the country's capital, Harare, from all over the world, including Israel, India, Lebanon and Russia to capitalise on the sale of over US$1.5 billion worth of diamonds.[28] Press Reports describe the Marange find as, 'the biggest in southern Africa since diamonds were discovered in South Africa a century ago'.[28]

In September 2013, Belgian and diamond industry officials successfully lobbied the European Union to lift sanctions on ZMDC diamonds. In December 2013, the first European Union Marange auction took place in Antwerp and fetched $10 million for 300,000 carats, working out to a price of just over $30 per-carat on average. A second auction is scheduled for February 12-21, 2014 where another 300,000 carats will be sold. [9]

Global Witness Quits Group on ‘Blood Diamonds’

The New York Times reported on Monday, December 5, 2011[29] Global Witness, withdrew from the Kimberley Process coalition, saying that it felt the effort no longer effectively ensured that conflict diamonds did not make their way onto retail markets. The organization is the first advocacy group to leave the program. While the organization had expressed concerns over the operation of the Kimberley Process for some time, the final straw leading to its withdrawal was the decision to allow Zimbabwe to export diamonds from the Marange fields, where there have been reports of widespread human rights abuses by government security forces. “It’s the most egregious situation that we’ve seen since the Kimberley Process was launched, where diamonds have been fueling violence and human rights violations, and the Kimberley has really failed to deal with that effectively,” said Annie Dunnebacke, the senior campaigner for Global Witness. The diamond industry was “hiding behind the Kimberley Process,” Ms. Dunnebacke said, adding that many traders and dealers did not perform due diligence in checking the actual source of the diamonds they were dealing. “They’ve just been saying, ‘We have the Kimberley Process for diamonds, so that’s that. We’ve solved the problem of blood diamonds.’” Farai Maguwu, the director of the Zimbabwe-based Centre for Research and Development, which is also a member of the Kimberley Process, said he believed Global Witness’s withdrawal was not enough to bring down the entire Kimberley Process. But, he said, “it’s a very big blow. The Kimberley Process will never be the same without the Global Witness,” Mr. Maguwu said. “A very influential member of the Kimberley Process has cast a vote of no confidence in the Kimberley Process, which will affect the way the whole world views the Kimberley Process going forward.”

Water Poisoning

A 2012 study commissioned by the Zimbabwe Environmental Lawyers Association (ZELA) and conducted by the University of Zimbabwe found that operations at the diamond fields are releasing dangerous chemicals into the Save River.[30] This is having dire consequences on the communities that live downstream from the river and there was panic in October 2012 when residents of these communities learned of the findings of the report and the potential medical effects this could have. Three diamond mining companies were found to be at fault; Anjin, Diamond Mining Corporation and Marange Resources.[30]

Rigged Elections

In 2013, US-based investigative platform 100 Reporters, published Central Intelligence Organization (CIO) documents revealing how $1 billion diamond revenues and support from companies including Mbada, Anjin and China Sonangol, would be invested in security and intelligence measures designed to rig the elections. The article [31] identified the Chinese role (including an official from the Chinese Communist Party),and alleged kickbacks to leaders in the SADC, dated May 2013, with the intent of having Mugabe become chair. Soon after the elections, this came to pass. The CIO listed specific steps taken to numerically rig the polls: "Registering less than ten real voters on “any given day with direct command from Nikuv” and the Party; Populating the voters’ roll before, and during, elections to counter unfavorable voting outcomes; Parallel registration and mobilization for “statistical maneuvering, depopulation and population of hostile constituencies,” in coordination with the Registrar’s Office and an official of the Chinese Communist Party identified in the documents as Chung Huwao; Obstructing registration in the 18-35 age brackets, and over-registering voters in the 35-90 age brackets; Using housing schemes to “re-orient beneficiaries” and log them on the voting roll; Deliberately congesting the Zimbabwean Electoral Commission registration by “security personnel and trusted lieutenants to delay the process as advised by Nikuv.”


  1. ^ "Zimbabwe", Global Witness.
  2. ^ Inside Zimbabwe's controversial Marange diamond field "Zimbabwe", CNN, March 16, 2012.
  3. ^ "Marange May Not Be The Worlds Largest Diamond Producer For Much Longer", Kitco, February 10, 2014.
  4. ^ a b c d Dixon, Robyn (4 Dec 2008). "Zimbabwe's deadly diamond fever". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-12-12. 
  5. ^ "ACR Plc"
  6. ^ a b "Calls To suspend Zimbabwe From KP". The Standard (Zimbabwe). 13 Dec 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-16. 
  7. ^ a b "Pressure group warns Zimbabwe against diamond sale", Reuters, April 28, 2010.
  8. ^ a b "Zimbabwe revokes Marange diamond ruling", Financial Times, September 7, 2010.
  9. ^ a b "Marange may not be the world’s largest diamond producer for much longer",, February 10, 2014.
  10. ^ "Zimbabwe Government Seizes Diamond Mine". Voice of America. 15 Dec 2006. Retrieved 2008-12-12. 
  11. ^ Kambemba, C. 2007. Kimberly Process Certification Scheme: Compliance and limitations in Southern Africa. Southern Africa Resources Watch / South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
  12. ^ "ZIMBABWE: Soldiers are the new illegal diamond miners". IRIN. 20 Jan 2009. Retrieved 2009-01-20. 
  13. ^ a b c "Diamond Industry Calls for Clampdown on Zimbabwe Smuggling". Rapaport. 12 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-12. 
  14. ^ a b "Government looking for land for mass burial, after killing 78 miners". SW Radio Africa via ZWnews. 11 Dec 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-12. 
  15. ^ "Zimbabwe meets diamond trade standards", IRIN, 30 June 2010.
  16. ^ McGreal, Chris (2008-12-11). "Bodies pile up as Mugabe wages war on diamond miners". Retrieved 2009-01-10. 
  17. ^ a b Swain, Jon (7 December 2008). "Battle for Zimbabwe’s blood diamonds". London: The Sunday Times (UK). Retrieved 2008-12-12. 
  18. ^ "Bye-bye Chiadzwa". The Herald (Zimbabwe). 29 Jan 2009. Retrieved 2009-01-29. 
  19. ^ "Mugabe forces 5 000 families out of homes". ZimEye. 29 Jan 2009. Retrieved 2009-01-29. 
  20. ^ a b Andersson, Hilary (8 August 2011). "Marange diamond field: Zimbabwe torture camp discovered".  
  21. ^ "Rapaport bans Zimbabwe's Marange Diamonds". Rapaport. 24 Nov 2009. 
  22. ^ Childress, Sarah (6 Nov 2009). "Diamond Trade Finds Regulatory Loophole in Mozambique".  
  23. ^ Bosch, Hirsch (6 May 2010). Trade of Marange diamonds in compliance with KPCS requirements; Vigilance against the laundering of illicit shipments (Report).
  24. ^ "Zimbabwe gets go-ahead to sell diamonds again", The Independent, July 17, 2010.
  25. ^ "Zimbabwe’s diamonds saga continues - African diamond producers back Zimbabwe", The Insider (Zimbabwe), November 20, 2010.
  26. ^ "Monitor to Clear Zimbabwe Diamonds", Wall Street Journal, May 28, 2010.
  27. ^ "Zimbabwe meets diamond trade standards", Reuters, June 8, 2010.
  28. ^ a b "Zimbabwe holds £1bn diamond sale", August 11, 2010.
  29. ^ "Global Witness Quits Group on ‘Blood Diamonds’,"December 5, 2011.
  30. ^ a b Zimbabwe: Troubled Waters - Chemical Pollution in the Marange District,  
  31. ^

Further reading

  • The return of the bloody diamonds: miners at gunpoint in Zimbabwe, By Dan McDougall, Daily Mail Online, 19 September 2009 .
  • Diamond dealers ‘duped’ Zim govt, by Nelson Banya, Reuters, 5 November 2010.
  • Zimbabwe's 'Blood Diamonds' exposed by Wikileaks cable, by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, The Telegraph, 10 Dec 2010.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.