World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Disenchantment

Article Id: WHEBN0004279226
Reproduction Date:

Title: Disenchantment  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Max Weber, Voter turnout, Inner-worldly asceticism, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Miracles (Insane Clown Posse song)
Collection: Max Weber, Sociology Index, Sociology of Religion
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Disenchantment


In social science, disenchantment (German: Entzauberung) is the cultural rationalization and devaluation of mysticism apparent in modern society. The concept was borrowed from Friedrich Schiller[1] by Max Weber to describe the character of modernized, bureaucratic, secularized Western society, where scientific understanding is more highly valued than belief, and where processes are oriented toward rational goals, as opposed to traditional society where for Weber "the world remains a great enchanted garden".[2]

Contents

  • Enlightenment ambivalence 1
  • Sacralization 2
  • Reenchantment 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • Further reading 6
  • External links 7

Enlightenment ambivalence

Weber's ambivalent appraisal of the process of disenchantment as both positive and negative[3] was taken up by the Frankfurt school in their examination of the self-destructive elements in Enlightenment rationalism.[4]

Habermas has subsequently striven to find a positive foundation for modernity in the face of disenchantment, even while appreciating Weber's recognition of how far secular society was created from, and is still "haunted by the ghosts of dead religious beliefs".[5]

Some have seen the disenchantment of the world as a call for existentialist commitment and individual responsibility in the face of a collective normative void.[6]

Sacralization

Disenchantment is related to the notion of desacralization, whereby the structures and institutions that previously channeled spiritual belief into rituals that promoted collective identities came under attack and waned in popularity. According to Henri Hubert and Marcel Mauss, the ritual of sacrifice involved two processes: sacralization and desacralization. The first process endows a profane offering with sacred properties—consecration—which provides a bridge of communication between the worlds of the sacred and profane. Once the sacrifice has been made, the ritual must be desacralized in order to return the worlds of the sacred and profane to their proper places.[7]

Disenchantment operates on a macro-level, rather than the micro-level described above. It also destroys part of the process whereby the chaotic social elements that require sacralization in the first place continue with mere knowledge as their antidote. Thereby disenchantment can be related to Durkheim's concept of anomie: an un-mooring of the individual from the ties that bind in society.[8]

Reenchantment

In recent years, Weber's paradigm has been challenged by thinkers who see a process of "reenchantment" operating alongside that of disenchantment.[9]

Jung considered symbols to provide a means for the numinous to return from the unconscious to the desacralized world[10] - a means for the recovery of myth, and the sense of wholeness it once provided, by a disenchanted modernity.[11]

Ernest Gellner argued that though disenchantment was the inevitable product of modernity, many people just could not stand a disenchanted world, and therefore opted for various "re-enchantment creeds" (as he called them) such as psychoanalysis, Marxism, Wittgensteinianism, phenomenology and ethnomethodology. A noticeable feature of these re-enchantment creeds is that they all tried to make themselves compatible with naturalism: i.e., they did not refer to supernatural forces. [12]

Leo Ruickbie showed on the basis of research in the Neopagan community that modern magical practitioners demonstrated re-enchantment. Using both qualitative participant research and quantitative survey analysis he was able to demonstrate a range of re-enchanted characteristics conforming to those extrapolated from Weber's theories.[13][14]

See also

References

  1. ^ Richard Jenkins, Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re-Enchantment (2000) 1 Max Weber Studies 11.
  2. ^ Max Weber, The Sociology of Religion (1971) p. 270
  3. ^ A. J. Cascardi, The Subject of Modernity (1992) p. 19
  4. ^ G. Borradori, Philosophy in an Age of Terror (2004) p. 69
  5. ^ Murray E. G. Smith, Early Modern Social Theory (1998) p. 274
  6. ^ L. Embree ed., Schutzian Social Science (1999) p. 110-1
  7. ^ Bell, Catherine (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  p. 26
  8. ^ Bell
  9. ^ Joshua Landy and Michael Saler, eds., The Re-Enchantment of the World: Secular Magic in a Rational Age, Stanford University Press, 2009.
  10. ^ C. G. Jung, Man and his Symbols (1978) p. 83-94
  11. ^ Ann Casement, Who Owns Jung/ (2007) p. 20
  12. ^ John A. Hall, Ernest Gellner: An Intellectual Biography, Verso, 2010.
  13. ^ Leo Ruickbie, 'The Re-Enchanters: Theorising Re-Enchantment and Testing for its Presence in Modern Witchcraft', unpublished PhD thesis, King's College, London, 2005.
  14. ^ Leo Ruickbie, 'Weber and the Witches: Sociological Theory and Modern Witchcraft', Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies, 2006, 116-130.

Further reading

  •  
  •  
  •  
  • During, Simon (2002). Modern enchantments the cultural power of secular magic. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.  
  •  
  •  

External links

  • Disenchantment
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.