Description Details
Falling body experiments have shown gravity is not an attraction. Analogous to rolling a snow ball in space, objects in the path would be picked up. The larger the snow ball grows, the tighter it gets. Matter and the force of union would be incorporated. Dust particles build sand, then rock, and so forth, along with gravity. The force, or energy, is trapped within the structure. All joined elements share this center aiming potential, gravity. The coalition of mass and energy forms an activity center of building structures and emerging of a plant. ...

Excerpt Details
Gravity is not attraction. It is push, squeeze, or compression. The gathering of mases build a body and it's force of coalition, gravity. It might feel weak on an object. However, gravity center is the most intensive mass and energy center of a planet. The coalition of mass and energy forms an activity center of building structures and emerging of a plant....

Table of Contents Details
1 Introduction 2 Formation of Planet and Gravity 2.1 Nomad Planet and It’s Gravity 2.2 Rotation 2.3 Compressed Core 2.4 Electromagnetism 2.5 Bubble in Space 2.6 Growth and Development 3 Summary 4 Appendixes 4.1 Free Fall Test 4.2 Attraction and Tear 4.3 Magnetic Attraction 4.4 Inescapable Collision of Attraction 4.5 Paradoxes of Gravitational Attraction References...

Description Details
Falling body experiments have shown us the gravitational acceleration is independent of composition, shape, size, and distance. However, attracting acceleration is dependent on composition, shape, size, and distance. Therefore: Gravity is not an attraction. Gravity is a contact force of all elements moving toward a target in uniform acceleration regardless of their differences in composition, shape, size, and distance. As any force, gravity can not exist without mass. It has to be built by mass and it's momentum in the process of growing body. Only head-on congregation from gentle pairing to high speed collision can build such one way potential toward a common center. It is built together with the mass. The gathering coalesces structure, increases it size, and binding force of gravity. It is push, squeeze, or compression, but attraction or pull. A concentrative potential of all joined elements. Objects move to minimum contact field would lost their concentrative potential and experience micro gravity or weightlessness....

Excerpt Details
Gravitational acceleration is independent of composition, shape, size, and distance. However, attracting is dependent on composition, shape, size, and distance. Therefore: Gravity is not a force of attraction. It is a contact force of all elements moving toward a target in uniform acceleration regardless of their differences in composition, shape, size, and distance; a concentrative potential. Objects move to minimum contact field would lost their concentrative potential and experience micro gravity or weightlessness....

Table of Contents Details
1 Introduction 2 Free Fall Test 3 Attraction and Tear 4 Magnetic Attraction 5 Inescapable Collision of Attraction 6 Summary References

Description Details
Documentary of Project Home 2011 scientific research 1979 - 2011

Table of Contents Details
1- Introduction 3- Abstract 4- Objective of Project Home 2011 6- Technology developed in Project Home 2011 7- Project Home 2011 new theory of the big bang 10- Project Home 2011 research colleague John Obik- A brief history 14- Project Home 2011 research colleague Matthew Mitchel Urquhart- A brief history 19- News articles and publications 22- Post-Project Home 2011 scientific research work and accomplishments 24- Post Project Home 2011 successful bridge destruction and post-Project Home 2011 work completion if 2015 ...

Description Details
A line of thought explored herein is the correspondence between cosmological phenomena and condensed matter physics, and therefore we can think that the quantization of orbit distances can be caused by superfluid helium quantization. This issue is explored by F. Smarandache and V. Christianto. Moreover, F. Smarandache also discusses possible new era of research that is pertaining to superluminal physics and instantaneous physics. Ion Patrascu and D. Rabounski discuss superluminality from their perspectives. And M. Pereira discusses his Hypergeometrical Universe model....

Table of Contents Details
Preface III Contents IV Planetary orbits in Solar and Extrasolar systems (A. Rubcic & J. Rubcic) Fizika A, 19 no.3, 2010...................1 Areal velocities of planets and their comparison (P. Pintr, V. Per\inova% , A. Luks\) unpubl. 2011...................15 Distribution of distances in solar system (P. Pintr, V. Perinova , A. Luks) Chaos , Soliton, Fractals 2007...................27 New cosmological model of universe and possible quantization of the Hubble parameter (P.Pintr) unpublished paper, Dec. 2011...................39 Do we really understand the solar system? (M. Pitkanen) Nov. 27th 2011...................50 Inflation and TGD (M. Pitkanen) Dec. 10th 2011...................70 QCD and TGD (M. Pitkanen) Dec. 19th 2011...................78 Quantum arithmetics and the relationship between real and p-adic physics (M. Pitkanen) Dec. 12th 2011...................94 A blind pilot: who is super-luminal observer? (D. Rabounski) Progress in Physics Vol.2, 2008................126 Scientist deduced the existence of particles with faster-than-light speeds recently discovered by CERN. (I. Patrascu) Progress in Physics Vol.4, 20...

Description Details
Studies the pitfall and paradoxes of inflation theory, including big-bang, dark energy, and dark matter. We know car will not drive on frictionless surface. Space has no surface and completely frictionless. It will not carry anything along, even if space could expand. Invisible matter, normal or dark, has to be felt since it has to occupy space. Normal matter would not move freely in space occupied by dark matter and dark energy. If there is interaction between normal and dark, it will be shown by normal matter. It is meaningless if there is no interaction. Only SPACE can occupy same space with matter without interaction, isn't it? ...

Excerpt Details
If you are riding on a craft, it will not carry you away if you there is no friction between you and the craft. Space is completely frictionless. It has no surface, and can only be regarded as absolute zero viscosity. Expansion of the space, if possible, will not drag anything along. It would just flow through and zip away by itself....

Table of Contents Details
Contents Abstract i Contents ii List of Figures iii List of Tables iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Paradox of Space Expansion 5 3 Real Life Analogy of Inertia in Expanding Space 9 4 Paradox of Redshift & Expanding Space 4.1 Real Life Analogy of Radiation Trap 5 Paradox of Constant Pulsating Quasars in Expanding Space 6 Conclusion 7 Appendix - A Brief Experiment of Space 7.1 Space and Vacuum 7.2 Space and Friction 7.3 Space and Motion 7.4 Space and Expansion 7.5 Space and Compression 7.6 Space and Energy 7.7 Summary 8 Appendix - Mind-Bending Questions References...

Description Details
Fighting the blunders of modern physics is like fighting a hurricane by yelling at it, “Don’t do it, you’ll kill thousands of people!”

Excerpt Details
A few decades after the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) was published the genie was out of the bottle. Supported by the General Theory of Relativity too, nothing in physics was impossible anymore: light has the magic property of being c relative to whatever reference: the most unphysical, to express it mildly, hypothesis ever created in physics, mass can be generated by an arbitrary energy just by dividing it by c2, time dilation has been used to create space-time, space-time causes black holes, matter and gravitational waves got accepted as realistic physical phenomena, muons got equipped with their own clock in order to adapt their decay time to their velocity, electrons got spinning by creating fundamentally wrong evidence, the particle-wave duality effectively got accepted as a formal theory, leading to the most unrealistic physical models, etc., etc. This book shows these mistakes and suggests realistic models....

Table of Contents Details
Prologue I Einstein's and Galilei's Principle of Relativity II E=mc2: a self-evident non-physical equation III Maxwell’s equations, Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity and the Lorentz transformation: a historical review IV Analysis of the Around-the-World Atomic Clocks Experiment V From astronomical to terrestrial light VI The Doppler shift and the Special Theory of Relativity VII Conventional Definition of Potential Energy is Controversial VIII Why a photon is not a particle IX Matter Waves: a fable X Gravitational Waves: a fable XI Planck’s Theory of Heat Radiation criticized XII Correcting for Relativity in GPS makes no sense XIII Religious Science XIV Velocity of cosmic muons most likely much higher than c XV The Time of the Photon XVI No Evidence for Spinning Electrons XVII Light in vacuum behaves like sound in air XVIII The mystery of vacuum XIX The umpteenth evidence XX What went wrong with the atomic mass unit XXI Why Heisenberg-Schrödinger’s atomic model is invalid XXII Atomic nuclei modelled without exotic particles and magic forces XXIII Av...

Description Details
Big-bang and universe expansion are illusions of cosmic redshift. Space has no surface, boundary, and friction. Even if space could expand, it will no carry anything along. The size of the universe is defined by it's boundary, not the separation of objects. Unless the boundary of the universe can be measured, it's size can not be defined. Neither, can we linearly revert the universe had started from a very high density and high temperature state based on the receding objects. Beside, not only redshift of Doppler effect is over 92\% dominating in nature, not 50-50 linear assumption; but also it is independent of location. It is function of changing in distance. Distance objects do not necessarily have larger Doppler effect. Except redshift caused by frequency loss is location dependable. The interpretation of big bang and universe expansion based on the receding of objects is fundamentally unsound....

Excerpt Details
The dominating and exponential natures of radiation redshift do not suggest acceleratingly physical departure of all astronomical objects, neither inflation nor a common origin. Universe will continue as is, no extra matter and energy needed. Otherwise, besides the demand for run-away energy/matter; the interactions among ordinary energy/matter and run-away energy/matter; and acceleratingly expansion demands accelerating energy/matter; and on. It can only lead to run-away interpretations, and possibly science as well....

Table of Contents Details
1 Introduction 2 Illusion Caused By Radiation Redshift 3 Disprove Expanding Universe 4 Illusion of Expanding Space 4.1 Space, Mass, and Force 4.2 Displacement of Space Paradox 4.3 Expansion of Space Paradox 5 Motion of Objects VS. Background 6 Get Down To The Foundations 7 Summary References...