The SainteLaguë method (French pronunciation: ) is a highest quotient method for allocating seats in partylist proportional representation used in many voting systems. It is named after the French mathematician André SainteLaguë. The SainteLaguë method is quite similar to the D'Hondt method, but uses different divisors. In most cases the largest remainder method delivers almost identical results. The D'Hondt method gives similar results too, but favors larger parties compared to the SainteLaguë method.^{[1]} Often there is an electoral threshold, that is a minimum percentage of votes required to be allocated seats.
The SainteLaguë method is used in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq, Kosovo, Latvia, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden. In Germany it is used on the federal level for the Bundestag, and on the state level for the legislatures of BadenWürttemberg, Bremen, Hamburg, North RhineWestphalia, RhinelandPalatinate, and SchleswigHolstein).
The SainteLaguë method was used in Bolivia in 1993, in Poland in 2001, and in the elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council in 2006. A variant of this method, the modified SainteLaguë method, was used to allocate the proportional representation (PR) seats in the Constituent Assembly poll of Nepal in 2008.
The method has been proposed by the Green Party in Ireland as a reform for use in Dáil Éireann elections,^{[2]} and by the United Kingdom ConservativeLiberal Democrat coalition government in 2011 as the method for calculating the distribution of seats in elections to the country's upper house of parliament.^{[3]}
Contents

Description of the method 1

SainteLaguë and Webster 2

Modified SainteLaguë method 3

Threshold for seats 4

See also 5

References 6

External links 7
Description of the method
After all the votes have been tallied, successive quotients are calculated for each party. The formula for the quotient is^{[1]}


quot = \frac{V}{2s+1}
where:

V is the total number of votes that party received, and

s is the number of seats that party has been allocated so far, initially 0 for all parties.
Whichever party has the highest quotient gets the next seat allocated, and their quotient is recalculated given their new seat total. The process is repeated until all seats have been allocated.
The SainteLaguë method does not ensure that a party receiving more than half the votes will win at least half the seats; nor does its modified form.^{[4]} For example, with seven seats available and the votes split 53,000, 24,000 and 23,000, the allocation would be three, two and two seats respectively.
denominator

/1

/3

/5

/7

/9

/11

/13

Seats won (*)

True proportion

Party A

53,000*

17,666*

10,600*

7,571

5,888

4,818

4,076

3

3.71

Party B

24,000*

8,000*

4,800

3,428

2,666

2,181

1,846

2

1.68

Party C

23,000*

7,666*

4,600

3,285

2,555

2,090

1,769

2

1.61

The d'Hondt method differs by the formula to calculate the quotients \left( quot = \frac{V}{s+1}\right).^{[1]}
SainteLaguë and Webster
The SainteLaguë method is equivalent to Webster's method (named after its proponent, the U.S. senator Daniel Webster) in that they always give the same results, but the method of calculating the apportionment seems to be quite different.^{[5]} Webster invented his method for legislative apportionment (allocating legislative seats to regions based on their share of the population) rather than elections (allocating legislative seats to parties based on their share of the votes) but this makes no difference to the calculations in the method.
Webster's method is defined in terms of a Droop quota as in the largest remainder method; in this method, the quota is called a "divisor". For a given value of the divisor, the population count for each region is divided by this divisor and then rounded to give the number of legislators to allocate to that region. In order to make the total number of legislators come out equal to the target number, the divisor is adjusted to make the sum of allocated seats after being rounded give the required total.
One way to determine the correct value of the divisor would be to start with a very large divisor, so that no seats are allocated after rounding. Then the divisor may be successively decreased until one seat, two seats, three seats and finally the total number of seats are allocated. The number of allocated seats for a given region increases from s to s + 1 exactly when the divisor equals the population of the region divided by s + 1/2, so at each step the next region to get a seat will be the one with the largest value of this quotient. That means that this successive adjustment method for implementing Webster's method allocates seats in the same order to the same regions as the SainteLaguë method would allocate them.
Modified SainteLaguë method
Some countries, e.g. Nepal, Norway and Sweden, change the quotient formula for parties that have not yet been allocated any seats (s = 0) from V to V/1.4. That is, the modified method changes the sequence of divisors used in this method from (1, 3, 5, 7, ...) to (1.4, 3, 5, 7, ...). This gives slightly greater preference to the larger parties over parties that would earn, by a small margin, a single seat if the unmodified SainteLaguë's method were used. With the modified method, such small parties do not get any seat; these seats are instead given to a larger party.^{[1]}
Norway further amends this system by utilizing a twotier proportionality. The number of members to be returned from each of Norway's 19 constituencies (counties) depends on the population and area of the county: each inhabitant counts one point, while each square kilometer counts 1.8 points. Furthermore, one seat from each constituency is allocated according to the national distribution of votes.^{[6]}
Threshold for seats
Often a threshold or barrage is set, and any list party which does not receive at least a specified percentage of list votes will not be allocated any seats, even if it received enough votes to have otherwise receive a seat. Examples of countries using the SainteLaguë method with a threshold are Germany and New Zealand (5 %), although the threshold does not apply if a party wins at least one electorate seat in New Zealand or three electorate seats in Germany. Sweden uses a modified SainteLaguë method with a 4 % threshold, and a 12 % threshold in individual constituencies (i.e. a political party can gain representation with a minuscule representation on the national stage, if its vote share in at least one constituency exceeded 12%). Norway has a threshold of 4 % to qualify for the seats from each constituency that is allocated according to the national distribution of votes. This means that even though a party is below the threshold of 4% nationally, they can still get seats from constituencies they are particularly popular in.
See also
References

^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} . See in particular the section "SainteLague", pp. 174–175.

^ Ireland's Green Party website;

^ "House of Lords Reform Draft Bill" (PDF). Cabinet Office. May 2011. p. 16.

^ Miller, Nicholas R. (February 2013), "Election inversions under proportional representation", Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, New Orleans, March 810, 2013 (PDF) .

^ Badie, Bertrand; BergSchlosser, Dirk; Morlino, Leonardo, eds. (2011), International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Volume 1, SAGE, p. 754,

^ Norway's Ministry of Local Government website; Stortinget; General Elections; The main features of the Norwegian electoral system; accessed 22 August 2009
External links

Seats Calculator with the SainteLaguë method

Java implementation of Webster's method at cuttheknot

Elections New Zealand explanation of SainteLaguë

Java D'Hondt, SaintLague and HareNiemeyer calculator
This article was sourced from Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, EGovernment Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a nonprofit organization.