This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? Excessive Violence Sexual Content Political / Social
Email Address:
Article Id: WHEBN0021705978 Reproduction Date:
Rhine capitalism or Rhenish capitalism (also known as the Rhenish model or Rhineland model) is a contemporary economic order existing primarily in Western Europe.
The term originates from the French economist and (in 1991) Chairman of the Board and CEO Assurances Générales de France (AGF), Michel Albert who first used it in his book Capitalisme contre Capitalisme[1] He compared the so-called “neo-American model” of a capitalistic market economy, introduced by the administrations of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher with the “Rhine capitalism", present in Germany, France and in some of the Northern European economies.
While the former is based more on the ideas of Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, the latter, according to Albert, is founded on publicly organized social security. Albert analyzes the Rhenish model as the more equitable, efficient, and less violent one. However, according to Albert, complex psychological phenomena and the functioning of the press lets the American model appear more attractive and dynamic to the general public.
Against this Albert wrote - even in 1991 - for example: “The largest banks know, however, that they are literally 'too big to fail' and can count on a helping hand from government if the worst comes to the worst. America's political leaders would step in to prevent the crash of a major financial institution on the grounds that it could set off a lethal chain reaction culminating in widespread disaster. ... Thus, in yet another intriguing but ominous irony of history, 10 years of ultra-liberalism have resulted in a US financial system whose future may only be assured with the help of federal government handouts” (p. 61).
Albert identifies the following characteristics of Rhine capitalism:
According to Albert, both models differ little in their respective ideas about which goods are not tradable – with one major exception: religions. Areas where the models diverge significantly are the realm of negotiable goods (commodities, services) and that of mixed goods.
Two researchers, Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, followed up the idea of two different kinds of capitalism with a large, empirical, international study. They came to a typology of (a) liberal and (b) coordinated market economies with different institutions and governance systems.[2] The paradigm of a coordinated market economy is the German way of Rhine capitalism, the Social market economy, which, in the Anglo-Saxon world, is frequently called the “German model”, whereas - according to Hall/Soskice - the meaning of the expression “German model” is more referred to the social practice in Germany than to Erhards and Müller-Armacks fundamental concept.
The term Rhine capitalism is an allusion to the former German government capital Bonn at the river Rhine and is also related to the nearby town of Bad Godesberg where the German Social Democratic Party SPD accepted this kind of capitalism with the so-called Godesberg Program.[3] Apart from Germany's, Rhenish capitalism has been associated with other Northern European economies (Switzerland, Austria,[4] the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden) and it has also been used to characterize Japan's.[5]
It is linked to some principles of social legislation, which can be found in all these countries, as social security in illness, unemployment etc., reducing economic inequality, strong banking system but weak equity market, solidarity based insurances, a large public sector, and far reaching labor laws. Some economists also make a distinction between the Rhenish model and the Nordic model.
Capitalism, Laissez-faire, Ordoliberalism, Politics, Christian democracy
Belgium, France, Netherlands, Switzerland, Europe
Authority control, Vendée, Economist, Fontenay-le-Comte, Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques
Means of production, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Industrial revolution, Neoliberalism
Capitalism, Christian democracy, United Kingdom, Social democracy, Means of production
Pope, Catholicism, Pope Pius XII, Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI
Liberalism, Christian democracy, Capitalism, Social democracy, Industrial revolution