My Account |   | Help

# Nanson's method

Article Id: WHEBN0002001789
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Nanson's method Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Non-Monotonic Condorcet Methods Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Nanson's method

The Borda count can be combined with an instant-runoff procedure to create hybrid election methods that are called Nanson method and Baldwin method.

## Contents

• Nanson method 1
• Baldwin method 2
• Satisfied and failed criteria 3
• Use of Nanson and Baldwin 4
• References 5

## Nanson method

The Nanson method is based on the original work of the mathematician Edward J. Nanson.

Nanson's method eliminates those choices from a Borda count tally that are at or below the average Borda count score, then the ballots are retallied as if the remaining candidates were exclusively on the ballot. This process is repeated if necessary until a single winner remains.

## Baldwin method

This variant was devised by Joseph M. Baldwin and works like this:

Candidates are voted for on ranked ballots as in the Borda count. Then, the points are tallied in a series of rounds. In each round, the candidate with the fewest points is eliminated, and the points are re-tallied as if that candidate were not on the ballot.

## Satisfied and failed criteria

The Nanson method and the Baldwin method satisfy the Condorcet criterion: since Borda always gives any existing Condorcet winner more than the average Borda points, the Condorcet winner will never be eliminated. They do not satisfy the independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion, the monotonicity criterion, the participation criterion, the consistency criterion and the independence of clones criterion, while they do satisfy the majority criterion, the mutual majority criterion, the Condorcet loser criterion, and the Smith criterion. The Nanson method satisfies and the Baldwin method violates reversal symmetry.

## Use of Nanson and Baldwin

Nanson's method was used in city elections in the U.S. town of Marquette, Michigan in the 1920s.[1] It was formerly used by the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne and in the election of members of the University Council of the University of Adelaide. It was used by the University of Melbourne until 1983.

## References

1. ^ McLean, I. (2002). "Australian electoral reform and two concepts of representation".
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.

Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.