World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Federal drug policy of the United States

Article Id: WHEBN0011315309
Reproduction Date:

Title: Federal drug policy of the United States  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Abortion in the United States, Bath salts (drug), Affirmative action in the United States, Economy of the United States, Alcoholic beverage
Collection: Drug Policy of the United States
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Federal drug policy of the United States

Drug use has increased in all categories since the beginning of prohibition on January 17, 1920,[1] with the exception of opium; its use is at a fraction of its peak level. A major decline in the use of opium started after the Harrison Act of 1914 was initiated.[2] Use of heroin peaked between 1969 and 1971, marijuana between 1978 and 1979, and cocaine between 1987 and 1989.[3]

Between 1972 and 1988, the use of cocaine increased more than fivefold.[4] The usage patterns of the current two most culturally popular drugs: amphetamines and ecstasy, have shown similar gains.[1]

Secretly, many senior officials of the Reagan administration illegally trained and armed the Nicaraguan Contras, who were funded by the shipment of large quantities of cocaine into the United States using U.S. government aircraft and U.S. military facilities.[5][6] Funding for the Contras was also obtained through the illegal sale of weaponry to Iran.[7][8] When this practice was discovered and condemned in the media, it was referred to as the Iran–Contra affair.

In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, legalizing the growing and use of marijuana for medical purposes. This created significant legal and enforcement conflict between federal and state government laws. Courts have since decided that a state law in conflict with a federal law concerning cannabis is not valid. Cannabis is restricted by federal law (see Gonzales v. Raich). In 2010 California Proposition 19 (also known as the Regulate, Control & Tax Cannabis Act) was defeated with 53.5% 'No' votes, and 46.5% 'Yes' votes.[9]

Pursuant to regulations (34 C.F.R. 86) required by the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Amendments of 1989 (codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1011i), as a condition of receiving funds or any other form of financial assistance under any Federal program, an institution of higher education must certify that it has adopted and implemented a drug prevention program which adheres to regulations in 34 C.F.R. 86.100. It has recently gained renewed attention due to Colorado Amendment 64.[10]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Monitoring The Future
  2. ^ Stephen R. Kandall, M.D.:Women and Addiction in the United States—1850 to 1920
  3. ^ WGBH educational foundation. Interview with Dr. Robert Dupoint
  4. ^ Controlling Cocaine: Supply Versus Demand Programs
  5. ^ "The Contras, Cocaine, and Covert Operations / Documentation of Official U.S. Knowledge of Drug Trafficking and the Contras". The National Security Archive, The George Washington University. Retrieved July 22, 2006. 
  6. ^ Cockburn, Alexander; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout, the CIA, Drugs and the Press. New York: Verso.  
  7. ^ The Contras, Cocaine, and Covert Operations
  8. ^ "Excerpts From the Iran-Contra Report: A Secret Foreign Policy". The New York Times. 
  9. ^ "Supplement to the Statement of Vote Statewide Summary by County for State Ballot Measures".  
  10. ^ Yoder, Dezarae (February 25, 2013). "Marijuana illegal on campus despite Amendment 64".  

External links

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy
  • Drug Enforcement Agency
  • Prepared For The Senate Special Committee On Illegal DrugsNATIONAL DRUG POLICY: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - Report for the Canadian Parliament
  • Human Rights Watch Racially Disproportionate Drug Arrests
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.