World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Digital humanities

Article Id: WHEBN0003900832
Reproduction Date:

Title: Digital humanities  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Digital Medievalist, Software studies, Applied Research in Patacriticism, Center for Public History and Digital Humanities, Digital Classicist
Collection: Digital Humanities
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Digital humanities

Example of research which includes the use of digital methods: network analysis as an archival tool.[1]
Digital humanities is an area of research and teaching at the intersection of computing and the disciplines of the humanities. Developing from the fields of humanities computing, humanistic computing,[2] and digital humanities praxis ([3]) digital humanities embraces a variety of topics, from curating online collections to data mining large cultural data sets. Digital humanities (often abbreviated DH) currently incorporates both digitized and born-digital materials and combines the methodologies from traditional humanities disciplines (such as history, philosophy, linguistics, literature, art, archaeology, music, and cultural studies) and social sciences [4] with tools provided by computing (such as data visualisation, information retrieval, data mining, statistics, text mining, digital mapping), and digital publishing. As well, related subfields of digital humanities have emerged like software studies, platform studies, and critical code studies. Digital Humanities also intersects with new media studies and information science as well as media theory of composition and game studies, particularly in areas related to digital humanities project design and production.


  • Areas of inquiry 1
  • Environments and tools 2
  • History 3
  • Organizations and Institutions 4
  • Criticism and controversies 5
  • See also 6
    • Centers 6.1
    • Journals 6.2
    • Meetings 6.3
    • Miscellaneous 6.4
  • References 7
  • Bibliography 8
  • External links 9

Areas of inquiry

Digital humanities scholars use computational methods either to answer existing research questions or to challenge existing theoretical paradigms, generating new questions and pioneering new approaches. One goal is to systematically integrate computer technology into the activities of humanities scholars,[5] as is done in contemporary empirical social sciences. Such technology-based activities might include incorporation into the traditional arts and humanities disciplines use of text-analytic techniques; GIS; commons-based peer collaboration; and interactive games and multimedia.

Despite the significant trend in digital humanities towards networked and multimodal forms of knowledge, spanning social, visual, and haptic media, a substantial amount of digital humanities focuses on documents and text in ways that differentiate the field's work from digital research in Media studies, Information studies, Communication studies, and Sociology. Another goal of digital humanities is to create scholarship than transcends textual sources. This includes the integration of multimedia, metadata and dynamic environments. An example of this is The Valley of the Shadow project at the University of Virginia, the Vectors Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular at University of Southern California or Digital Pioneers projects at Harvard.

A growing number of researchers in digital humanities are using computational methods for the analysis of large cultural data sets such as the

  • The Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations
  • CenterNet
  • A Day in the Life of the Digital Humanities
  • Lev Manovich, Computational Humanities vs. Digital Humanities

External links

  • Beagle, Donald, (2014). Digital Humanities in the Research Commons: Precedents & Prospects, Association of College & Research Libraries: dh+lib.
  • Berry, D. M., ed. (2012). Understanding Digital Humanities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, & Jeffrey Schnap (2012). Digital_Humanities, The MIT Press
  • Busa, Roberto (1980). ‘The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus’, in Computers and the Humanities vol. 14, pp. 83–90. Computers and the Humanities (1966-2004)
  • Celentano, A., Cortesi, A. & Mastandrea, P. (2004). Informatica Umanistica: una disciplina di confine, Mondo Digitale, vol. 4, pp. 44–55.
  • Classen, Christoph, Kinnebrock, Susanne, & Löblich, Maria, eds. (2012). Towards Web History: Sources, Methods, and Challenges in the Digital Age. Historical Social Research, 37 (4), 97-188.
  • Condron Frances, Fraser, Michael & Sutherland, Stuart, eds. (2001). Oxford University Computing Services Guide to Digital Resources for the Humanities, West Virginia University Press.
  • Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2011). Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York; NYU Press.
  • Gold, Matthew K., ed. (2012). Debates In the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hancock, B., & Giarlo, M.J. (2001). Moving to XML: Latin texts XML conversion project at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Library Hi Tech, 19(3), 257-264.
  • Hockey, Susan (2001). Electronic Text in the Humanities: Principles and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Honing, Henkjan (2008). The role of ICT in music research: A bridge too far?International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 1 (1), 67-75.
  • Inman James, Reed, Cheryl, & Sands, Peter, eds. (2003). Electronic Collaboration in the Humanities: Issues and Options, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kenna, Stephanie & Ross, Seamus, eds. (1995). Networking in the humanities: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scholarship and Technology in the Humanities held at Elvetham Hall, Hampshire, UK 13–16 April 1994. London: Bowker-Saur.
  • Kirschenbaum, Matthew (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • McCarty, Willard (2005). Humanities Computing, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Moretti, Franco (2007). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. New York: Verso.
  • Mullings, Christine, Kenna, Stephanie, Deegan, Marilyn, & Ross, Seamus, eds. (1996). New Technologies for the Humanities London: Bowker-Saur.
  • Newell, William H., ed. (1998). Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Nowviskie, Bethany, ed. (2011). Alt-Academy: Alternative Academic Careers for Humanities Scholars. New York: MediaCommons.
  • Ramsay, Steve (2011). Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray & Unsworth, John, eds. (2004). A Companion To Digital Humanities Blackwell Publishers.
  • Selfridge-Field, Eleanor, ed. (1997). Beyond MIDI: The Handbook of Musical Codes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Thaller, Manfred, ed. (2012). Controversies around the Digital Humanities. Historical Social Research, 37 (3), 7-229.
  • Unsworth, John (2005). Scholarly Primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this?
  • Warwick C., Terras, M., & Nyhan, J., eds. (2012). Digital Humanities in Practice, Facet


  1. ^ League of Nations archives, United Nations Office in Geneva. Network visualization and analysis published in Grandjean, Martin (2014). "La connaissance est un réseau". Les Cahiers du Numérique 10 (3): 37–54. Retrieved 2014-10-15. 
  2. ^ Humanistic Computing, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 86, No. 11, November, 1998, Pages 2123-2151.
  3. ^
  4. ^ "Digital Humanities Network". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 27 December 2012. 
  5. ^ Opportunities/tabid/57/Default.aspx "Grant Opportunities". National Endowment for the Humanities, Office of Digital Humanities Grant Opportunities. Retrieved 25 January 2012. 
  6. ^ Roth, S. (2014), Fashionable functions. A Google ngram view of trends in functional differentiation (1800-2000), International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Band 10, Nr. 2, S. 34-58 (online:
  7. ^ Bobley, Brett (December 1, 2008). "Grant Announcement for Humanities High Performance Computing Program". National Endowment for the Humanities. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  8. ^ "Awardees of 2009 Digging into Data Challenge". Digging into Data. 2009. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  9. ^ "NEH Announces Winners of 2011 Digging Into Data Challenge". National Endowment for the Humanities. January 3, 2012. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  10. ^ Cohen, Patricia (2010-11-16). "Humanities Scholars Embrace Digital Technology". The New York Times (New York).  
  11. ^ Williford, Christa; Henry, Charles (June 2012). "Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Report on the Experiences of First Respondents to the Digging Into Data Challenge". Council on Library and Information Resources.  
  12. ^ Presner, Todd (2010). "Digital Humanities 2.0: A Report on Knowledge". Connexions. Retrieved 2012-06-09. 
  13. ^ Bradley, John (2012). "No job for techies: Technical contributions to research in digital humanities". In Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty (eds.). Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate. pp. 11–26 [14].  
  14. ^ Unsworth, John (2002-11-08). "What is Humanities Computing and What is not?". Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie 4. Retrieved 2012-05-31. 
  15. ^ Svensson, Patrik (2009). "Humanities Computing as Digital Humanities". Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (3).  
  16. ^ a b Hockney, Susan (2004). "The History of Humanities Computing". In Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, John Unsworth (eds.). Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.  
  17. ^ Women Writers Project, Brown University, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  18. ^ Jerome J. McGann (ed.), Rossetti Archive, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  19. ^ Morris Eaves, Robert Essick, and Joseph Viscomi (ed.), The William Blake Archive, retrieved 2012-06-16 
  20. ^ Liu, Alan (2004). "Transcendental Data: Toward a Cultural History and Aesthetics of the New Encoded Discourse". Critical Inquiry 31 (1): 49–84.  
  21. ^ a b c Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (2011-05-08). "The humanities, done digitally". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2011-07-10. 
  22. ^ Berry, David (2011-06-01). "The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities". Culture Machine. Retrieved 2012-01-31. 
  23. ^ a b Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. (2010). "What is Digital Humanities and What's it Doing in English Departments?". ADE Bulletin (150). 
  24. ^ Howard, Jennifer (2009-12-31). "The MLA Convention in Translation". The Chronicle of Higher Education.  
  25. ^ Pannapacker, William (2009-12-28). "The MLA and the Digital Humanities" (The Chronicle of Higher Education). Brainstorm. Retrieved 2012-05-30. 
  26. ^ Vanhoutte, Edward (2011-04-01). "Editorial". Literary and Linguistic Computing 26 (1): 3–4.  
  27. ^ "About". CenterNet. Retrieved June 16, 2012. 
  28. ^ Caraco, Benjamin (1 January 2012). "Les digital humanities et les bibliothèques". Le Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France 57 (2). Retrieved 12 April 2012. 
  29. ^
  30. ^ Fish, Stanley (2012-01-09). "The Digital Humanities and the Transcending of Mortality". The New York Times (New York). Retrieved 2012-05-30. 
  31. ^
  32. ^
  33. ^ "Digital Humanities Programs and Organizations". UCLA Digital Humanities. Retrieved 2 November 2014. 
  34. ^



The Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations maintains a comprehensive list of digital humanities centers



See also

At present, formal academic recognition of digital work in the humanities remains somewhat problematic, although there are signs that this might be changing. Some universities offer programs related to the field[33] and some have dedicated Digital Humanities programmes.[34]

This is a current source of debate within the digital humanities. [32] There has also been some recent controversy amongst practitioners of digital humanities around the role that race and/or identity politics plays in digital humanities. Tara McPherson attributes some of the lack of racial diversity in digital humanities to the modality of

The literary theorist Stanley Fish claims that the digital humanities pursue a revolutionary agenda and thereby undermine the conventional standards of "pre-eminence, authority and disciplinary power."[30]

An edited text, 'Debates in the Digital Humanities' (2012) has identified a range of criticisms of digital humanities: 'a lack of attention to issues of race, class, gender, and sexuality; a preference for research-driven projects over pedagogical ones; an absence of political commitment; an inadequate level of diversity among its practitioners; an inability to address texts under copyright; and an institutional concentration in well-funded research universities'.[29]

Criticism and controversies

CenterNet is an international network of about 100 digital humanities centers in 19 countries, working together to benefit digital humanities and related fields.[27][28]

ADHO also oversees a joint annual conference, which began as the ACH/ALLC (or ALLC/ACH) conference, and is now known as the Digital Humanities conference.

[26] The field of digital humanities is served by several organisations:

Organizations and Institutions

Digital humanities emerged from its former niche status and became "big news"[23] at the 2009 MLA convention in Philadelphia, where digital humanists made "some of the liveliest and most visible contributions"[24] and had their field hailed as "the first 'next big thing' in a long time."[25]

In 2006 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), launched the Digital Humanities Initiative (renamed Office of Digital Humanities in 2008), which made widespread adoption of the term "digital humanities" all but irreversible in the United States.[23]

The terminological change from "humanities computing" to "digital humanities" has been attributed to John Unsworth and Ray Siemens who, as editors of the monograph A Companion to Digital Humanities (2004), tried to prevent the field from being viewed as "mere digitization."[21] Consequently, the hybrid term has created an overlap between fields like rhetoric and composition, which use "the methods of contemporary humanities in studying digital objects,"[21] and digital humanities, which uses "digital technology in studying traditional humanities objects".[21] The use of computational systems and the study of computational media within the arts and humanities more generally has been termed the 'computational turn'.[22]

In the nineties, major digital text and image archives emerged at centers of humanities computing in the U.S. (e.g. the Women Writers Project,[17] the Rossetti Archive,[18] and The William Blake Archive[19]), which demonstrated the sophistication and robustness of text-encoding for literature.[20]

The Text Encoding Initiative, born from the desire to create a standard encoding scheme for humanities electronic texts, is the outstanding achievement of early humanities computing. The project was launched in 1987 and published the first full version of the TEI Guidelines in May 1994.[16]

Other aspects of digital humanities were descended from the IRIS Intermedia project on hypertext at Brown University in the 1980s.

Digital humanities descends from the field of humanities computing, of computationally enabled "formal representations of the human record,"[14] whose origins reach back to the late 1940s in the pioneering work of Roberto Busa.[15][16]


Digital humanities is also involved in the creation of software, providing "environments and tools for producing, curating, and interacting with knowledge that is 'born digital' and lives in various digital contexts."[12] In this context, the field is sometimes known as computational humanities. Many such projects share a "commitment to open standards and open source."[13]

Environments and tools

[11] in Canada.SSHRC in the UK, and JISC and in partnership with [10] by NEH in collaboration with NSF,[9] and 2011[8]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.