World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Dutch language

Nederlands, Vlaams
Pronunciation  ( )
Native to Mainly the Netherlands, Belgium, and Suriname; also in Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, as well as France (French Flanders).
Region mainly Western Europe, today also in Africa, South America and the Caribbean.
Native speakers
23 million  (2006)[1]
28 million (L1 plus L2 speakers) (2012)[2][3]
Early forms
Latin (Dutch alphabet)
Dutch Braille
Signed Dutch (Nederlands met Gebaren)
Official status
Official language in
 Sint Maarten
European Union
Union of South American Nations
Regulated by Nederlandse Taalunie
(Dutch Language Union)
Language codes
ISO 639-1 nl
ISO 639-2 dut (B)
nld (T)
ISO 639-3 Variously:
nld – Dutch/Flemish
vls – West Flemish (Vlaams)
zea – Zealandic (Zeeuws)
Glottolog mode1257[4]
Linguasphere 52-ACB-a (varieties:
52-ACB-aa to -an)
Dutch-speaking world (included are areas of daughter-language Afrikaans).

Dutch (   ) is a West Germanic language and the native language of most of the population of the Netherlands, and about sixty percent of the populations of Belgium and Suriname, the three member states of the Dutch Language Union. Most speakers live in the European Union, where it is a first language for about 23 million and a second language for another 5 million people.[1][2][3][5]

Dutch also holds official status in the Caribbean island nations of Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten, whereas Dutch or dialects assigned to it continue to be spoken, in parts of France and Germany, and to a lesser extent, in Indonesia,[n 1] and up to half a million native Dutch speakers may be living in the United States, Canada, and Australia.[n 2] The Cape Dutch dialects of Southern Africa have been standardised into Afrikaans, a partially mutually intelligible daughter language[n 3] which today is spoken by an estimated total of 15 to 23 million people in South Africa and Namibia.[n 4]

Dutch is closely related to German and English[n 5] and is said to be between them.[n 6] Dutch shares with German a similar word order, having grammatical gender, and a largely Germanic vocabulary, it has however—like English—not undergone the High German consonant shift, has mostly abandoned the grammatical case system, does not use Germanic umlaut as a grammatical marker, and has levelled much of its morphology.[n 7] Dutch has three grammatical genders,[6] but this distinction has fewer grammatical consequences than in German.[n 8] Dutch also shares with German the use of modal particles,[7] final-obstruent devoicing, and the use of subject–verb–object word order in main clauses and subject–object–verb in subordinate clauses[n 9]. The view about mutual intelligibility between Dutch and German varies.[8][9] Dutch vocabulary is mostly Germanic and contains the same Germanic core as German and English, incorporating more Romance loans than German and fewer than English.[n 10]


  • Names 1
  • Classification 2
  • Diachronic 3
  • Geographic distribution 4
    • Europe 4.1
      • Netherlands 4.1.1
      • Belgium 4.1.2
        • Brussels
      • France 4.1.3
    • Asia 4.2
    • Oceania 4.3
    • Americas 4.4
      • Suriname 4.4.1
      • Caribbean 4.4.2
      • North America 4.4.3
    • Africa 4.5
      • Belgian Africa 4.5.1
      • Afrikaans 4.5.2
  • History 5
    • Development phases 5.1
  • Dialects 6
  • Phonology 7
    • Consonants 7.1
    • Vowels 7.2
    • Phonotactics 7.3
    • Polder Dutch 7.4
  • Grammar 8
    • Genders and cases 8.1
    • Word order 8.2
    • Diminutives 8.3
    • Compounds 8.4
  • Vocabulary 9
  • Writing system 10
  • Dutch as a foreign language 11
  • Popular misconceptions 12
    • The language of Flanders 12.1
    • Dutch and German as sister languages 12.2
    • Low Dietsch 12.3
    • Dutch and English as sister languages 12.4
    • Pennsylvania Dutch 12.5
    • Dutch, not Deutsch 12.6
  • See also 13
  • Notes 14
  • References 15
  • Bibliography 16
  • External links 17


While "Dutch" generally refers to the language as a whole, Belgian varieties are sometimes collectively referred to as "Flemish". In both Belgium and the Netherlands, the native official name for Dutch is Nederlands, and its dialects have their own names, e.g. Hollands "Hollandish", West-Vlaams "Western Flemish", Brabants "Brabantian".[10]

The language has been known under a variety of names. In Middle Dutch, dietsc (in the South) and diutsc, duutsc (in the North) were used to refer variably to Dutch, Low German, and German. This word is derived from diet "people" and was used to translate Latin (lingua) vulgaris "popular language" to set apart the Germanic vernacular from Latin (the language of writing and the Church) and Romance.[11] An early form of this word appears Latinized in the Strasbourg Oaths (AD 842) as teudisca (lingua) to refer to the Rhenish Franconian portion of the oath and also underlies dialectal French thiois "Luxembourgish", "Lorraine Franconian".

During the Renaissance in the 16th century, duytsch (modern Duits) "German" and nederduytsch "Low German" began to be differentiated from dietsch or nederlandsch "Dutch",[12] a distinction that is echoed in English later the same century with the terms High Dutch "German" and Low Dutch "Dutch". However, owing to Dutch commercial and colonial rivalry in the 16th and 17th centuries, the English term came to refer exclusively to the Dutch. In modern Dutch, Duits has narrowed in meaning to refer to "German", Diets went out of common use because of its Nazi associations[13] and now somewhat romantically refers to older forms of Dutch,[14] whereas Vlaams is sometimes used to name the language as a whole for the varieties spoken in Belgium.[15]

Nederlands, the official Dutch word for "Dutch", did not become firmly established until the 19th century. The repeated use of neder- or "low" to refer to the language is a reference to the Netherlands' downriver location at the mouth of the Rhine (harking back to Latin nomenclature, e.g. Germania inferior vs. Germania superior) and its position at the lowest dip of the Northern European plain.[16][17][18]


Dutch belongs to its own West Germanic sub-group, West Low Franconian, paired with its sister language Limburgish, or East Low Franconian, both of which stand out by mixing characteristics of Low German and High German.[19] Dutch is at one end of a dialect continuum known as the Rhenish fan where German gradually turns into Dutch. There was also at one time a dialect continuum that blurred the boundary between Dutch and Low German. In some small areas, there are still dialect continua, but they are gradually becoming extinct.

All three languages have shifted earlier /θ/ > /d/, show final-obstruent devoicing (Du brood "bread" [broːt]), and experienced lengthening of short vowels in stressed open syllables which has led to contrastive vowel length that is used as a morphological marker. Dutch stands out from Low German and High German in its retention of the clusters /sp/ and /st/, while shifting of /sk/ to /sx/. It also did not develop i-mutation as a morphological marker, although some eastern dialects did. In earlier periods, Low Franconian of either sort differed from Low German by maintaining a three-way plural verb conjugation (Old Dutch -un, -it, -untMiddle Dutch -en, -t, -en).

In modern Dutch, the former 2nd-person plural (-t) took the place of the 2nd-person singular, and the plural endings were reduced into a single form -en (cf. Du jij maakt "you(sg) make" vs. wij/jullie/zij maken "we/you(pl)/they make"). However, it is still possible to distinguish it from German (which has retained the three-way split) and Low German (which has -t in the present tense: wi/ji/se niemmet "we/you(pl)/they take"). Dutch and Low German show the collapsing of older ol/ul/al + dental into ol + dental, but in Dutch wherever /l/ was pre-consonantal and after a short vowel, it vocalized, e.g., Du goud "gold", zout "salt", woud "woods" : LG Gold, Solt, Woold : Germ Gold, Salz, Wald.

With Low German, Dutch shares:

  • The development of /xs/ > /ss/ (Du vossen "foxes", ossen "oxen", LG Vösse, Ossen vs. Germ Füchse, Ochsen)
  • /ft//xt/ though it is far more common in Dutch (Du zacht "soft", LG sacht vs. Germ sanft, but Du lucht "air" vs. LG/Germ Luft)
  • Generalizing the dative over the accusative case for certain pronouns (Du mij "me" (MDu di "you (sg.)"), LG mi/di vs. Germ mich/dich)
  • Lack of the second consonant shift
  • Monophthongization of Germanic *ai > ē and *au > ō, e.g., Du steen "stone", oog "eye", LG Steen, Oog vs. G Stein, Auge, although this is not true of Limburgish (cf. sjtein, oug). Exceptions include klein "small" and geit "goat" (but West Flemish kleene, geet).
  • Loss of Germanic -z (which later became -r) in monosyllabic words. For example, the German pronoun wir "we" corresponds to Du wij (but Limburgish veer), LG wi.

Dutch shares with German:

  • The reflexive pronoun zich (Germ sich). This was originally borrowed from Limburgian, which is why in most dialects (Flemish, Brabantine) the usual reflexive is hem/haar, just like in the rest of West Germanic.
  • Diphthongization of Germanic ē² > ie > i and ō > uo > u (Du hier "here", voet "foot", Germ hier, Fuß (from earlier fuoz) vs. LG hier [iː], Foot [oː])
  • Voicing of pre-vocalic initial voiceless alveolar fricatives, e.g., Du zeven "seven", Germ sieben [z] vs. LG söven, seven [s].
  • Final-obstruent devoicing


The table below shows the succession of the significant historical stages of each language (horizontally) and their approximate groupings in subfamilies (vertically). Vertical sequence within each group does not imply a measure of greater or lesser similarity.

Pre-Roman Iron Age
500 – 100 BC
Roman Iron Age
100 BC – 100 AD
Roman Iron Age
100 – 300
Migration Period
300 – 600
Early Middle Ages
600 – 1100
Middle Ages
1100 – 1350
Late Middle Ages
1350 – 1500
Early Modern Age
1500 – 1700
Modern Age
1700 to present
Proto-Germanic West Germanic Irminonic
(Elbe Germanic)
Primitive Upper German Old Upper German,
Middle Upper German Early
New Upper German
Upper German varieties
Standard German
(Weser-Rhine Germanic)
Primitive Frankish Old Frankish Old Central German Middle Central German Early
New Central German
Central German varieties
Old Low Franconian
(Old Dutch)
Early Limburgish
Middle Dutch
Late Limburgish
Middle Dutch
Early Limburgish Limburgish
Middle Dutch
Middle Dutch
Modern Dutch
Dutch varieties
(North Sea Germanic)
Primitive Saxon
(Southeast Ingvaeonic)
Old Saxon Middle Low German Low German varieties
Primitive Frisian Old Frisian Middle Frisian Frisian varieties
Primitive Anglic Old English
Middle English
Middle English
Modern English
English varieties
Early Scots Middle Scots Scots varieties
North Germanic Proto-Norse Runic
Old West Norse
Old Icelandic Late
Old Icelandic
Old Norwegian Old Faroese Faroese
Old Norn Norn extinct
Old East Norse
Middle Norwegian Norwegian
Old Danish
Old Danish
Old Swedish
Old Swedish
Dalecarlian dialects
Old Gutnish
Old Gutnish
Old Gutnish
Gutnish extinct
East Germanic Gothic (unattested Gothic dialects) Crimean Gothic extinct
Vandalic extinct
Burgundian extinct
  • ^1 There are conflicting opinions on the classification of Lombardic. It has also been classified as close to Old Saxon.
  • ^2 Late Middle Ages refers to the post-Black Death period. Especially for the language situation in Norway this event was important.
  • ^3 From Early Northern Middle English.[20] McClure gives Northumbrian Old English.[21] In the Oxford Companion to the English Language (p. 894) the 'sources' of Scots are described as "the Old English of the Kingdom of Bernicia" and "the Scandinavian-influenced English of immigrants from Northern and Midland England in the 12-13c [...]." The historical stages 'Early—Middle—Modern Scots' are used, for example, in the "Concise Scots Dictionary"[22] and "A Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue".[23]
  • ^4 The speakers of Norn were assimilated to speak the Modern Scots varieties.
  • ^5 The Gutnish language today is practically a dialect of Swedish.
  • ^6 Mainland Old Norwegian existed along a dialect continuum between West and East Old Norse.

Geographic distribution

Dutch is an European Union and the Union of South American Nations.[24] It is used unofficially in the Caribbean Community.



Dutch is the official and foremost language of the Netherlands, a nation of 16.7 million people of whom 96 percent speak Dutch as their mother tongue.[25] In the province of Friesland and a small part of Groningen, Frisian is also recognised and is spoken by a few hundred thousand Frisians. In the Netherlands there are many different dialects, but these are often overruled and replaced by the language of the media, school, government (i.e., Standard Dutch).

Immigrant languages are Indonesian, Turkish, English, Spanish, German, Berber, Moroccan Arabic, Papiamento, and Sranan. In the second generation these newcomers often speak Dutch as their mother tongue, sometimes alongside the language of their parents.


The language situation in Belgium.

Belgium, a nation of 11 million people, has three official languages, which are, in order from the largest speaker population to the smallest, Dutch (sometimes colloquially referred to as Flemish), French, and German. An estimated 59% of all Belgians speak Dutch as their first language, while French is the mother tongue of 40%.[26]

Dutch is the official language of the Flemish Region (where it is the mother tongue of about 97% of the population)[25] and one of the two official languages —along with French— of the Brussels Capital Region. Dutch is not official nor a recognised minority language in the Walloon Region, although on the border with the Flemish Region, there are four municipalities with language facilities for Dutch speakers. The most important Dutch dialects spoken in Belgium are West Flemish (also spoken in French Flanders), East Flemish, Brabantian, and Limburgish, the latter having a dialect continuum in northeastern Wallonia and adjacent areas of Germany (as Low Dietsch).

Home languages in Brussels Capital Territory (2006)[27]
  French only
  French & Dutch
  French & language other than Dutch
  Dutch only
  Neither French nor Dutch

Since the founding of the Kingdom of Belgium in 1830, its capital Brussels has transformed from being almost entirely Dutch-speaking, with a small French minority, to being a multilingual city with French as the majority language and lingua franca. This language shift, the Frenchification of Brussels, is rooted in the 18th century but accelerated after Belgium became independent and Brussels expanded past its original boundaries.[28][29]

Not only is French-speaking immigration responsible for the frenchification of Brussels, but more importantly the language change over several generations from Dutch to French was performed in Brussels by the Flemish people themselves. The main reason for this was the low social prestige of the Dutch language in Belgium at the time.[30] From 1880 on more and more Dutch-speaking people became bilingual resulting in a rise of monolingual French speakers after 1910. Halfway through the 20th century the number of monolingual French speakers carried the day over the (mostly) bilingual Flemish inhabitants.[31]

Only since the 1960s, after the fixation of the Belgian language border and the socio-economic development of Flanders was in full effect, could Dutch stem the tide of increasing French use.[32] This phenomenon is, together with the future of Brussels, one of the most controversial topics in all of Belgian politics.[33][34]

Today an estimated 16 percent of city residents are native speakers of Dutch, while an additional 13 percent claim to have a "good to excellent" knowledge of Dutch.[27]


Language situation in the Dunkirk district of northern France in 1874 and then in 1972.

French Flemish, a variant of West Flemish, is spoken in the north-east of France by an estimated population of 20,000 daily speakers and 40,000 occasional speakers. It is spoken alongside French, which is gradually replacing it for all purposes and in all areas of communication.[35] Neither Dutch nor its regional French Flemish variant is afforded legal status in France, either by the central or regional public authorities, by the education system or before the courts. In brief, the state takes no measures to ensure the use of Dutch in France.[35]

In the 9th century the Germanic–Romance language border went from the mouth of the Canche to just north of the city of Lille, where it coincided with the present language border in Belgium.[36] From the late 9th century on, the border gradually started to shift northward and eastward to the detriment of the Germanic language.[36]

Boulogne-sur-Mer was bilingual up to the 12th century, Calais up to the 16th century, and Saint-Omer until the 18th century. The western part of the County of Flanders, consisting of the castellanies of Bourbourg, Bergues, Cassel and Bailleul, became part of France between 1659 and 1678. However, the linguistic situation in this formerly monolingually Dutch-speaking region did not dramatically change until the French Revolution in 1789, and Dutch continued to fulfil the main functions of a cultural language throughout the 18th century.[36]

During the 19th century, especially in the second half of it, Dutch was banned from all levels of education and lost most of its functions as a cultural language. The cities of Dunkirk, Gravelines and Bourbourg had become predominantly French-speaking by the end of the 19th century. In the countryside, until World War I, many elementary schools continued to teach in Dutch, and the Roman Catholic Church continued to preach and teach the cathechism in Flemish in many parishes.[36]

Nonetheless, since French enjoyed a much higher status than Dutch, from about the interbellum onward everybody became bilingual, the generation born after World War II being raised exclusively in French. In the countryside, the passing on of Flemish stopped during the 1930s or 1940s. As a consequence, the vast majority of those still having an active command of Flemish belong to the generation of over the age of 60.[36] Therefore, complete extinction of French Flemish can be expected in the coming decades.[36]


An anachronous map of the Dutch colonial Empire. Light green: territories administered by or originating from territories administered by the Dutch East India Company; dark green the Dutch West India Company.
The growth of the Dutch East Indies.[37]

Despite the Dutch presence in Indonesia for almost 350 years, the Dutch language has no official status there[38] and the small minority that can speak the language fluently are either educated members of the oldest generation, or employed in the legal profession,[39] as some legal codes are still only available in Dutch.[40] Many universities include Dutch as a source language, mainly for law and history students (roughly 35,000 of them nationally).[41][42]

Unlike other European nations, the Dutch chose not to follow a policy of language expansion amongst the indigenous peoples of their colonies.[43] In the last quarter of the 19th century, however, a local elite gained proficiency in Dutch so as to meet the needs of expanding bureaucracy and business.[44] Nevertheless, the Dutch government remained reluctant to teach Dutch on a large scale for fear of destabilising the colony. Dutch, the language of power, was supposed to remain in the hands of the leading elite.[44]

Instead, use of local languages —or, where this proved to be impractical, of Malay— was encouraged. As a result, fewer than 2% of Indonesians could speak Dutch in 1940.[44] Only when in 1928 the Indonesian nationalist movement had chosen Malay as a weapon against Dutch influence, the colonial authorities gradually began to introduce Dutch into the educational curriculum. But because of the chaos of the 1942 Japanese invasion and the subsequent Indonesian independence in 1945, this shift in policy did not come into full effect.[44]

After independence, Dutch was dropped as an official language and replaced by Malay. Yet the Indonesian language inherited many words from Dutch: words for everyday life as well as scientific and technological terms.[45] One scholar argues that 20% of Indonesian words can be traced back to Dutch words,[46] many of which are transliterated to reflect phonetic pronunciation e.g. kantoor (Dutch for "office") in Indonesian is kantor, while bus ("bus") becomes bis.

In addition, many Indonesian words are calques on Dutch, for example, rumah sakit (Indonesian for "hospital") is calqued on the Dutch ziekenhuis (literally "sick house"), kebun binatang ("zoo") on dierentuin (literally "animal garden"), undang-undang dasar ("constitution") from grondwet (literally "basic law"). These account for some of the differences in vocabulary between Indonesian and Malay.

The first spelling system for Indonesian, devised by Charles van Ophuijsen[46] was influenced by Dutch, with the use of Dutch letter combinations such as oe. For example, tempo doeloe (meaning "the past") was pronounced as "dulu". In 1947, this was changed to u, hence tempo dulu. However, the letter combination oe continued to be used in people's names, e.g. the first two Presidents of Indonesia, Sukarno and Suharto, are often written as Soekarno and Soeharto. In 1972, following an agreement with Malaysia to harmonise the spelling of Indonesian and Malay, other Dutch-influenced letter combinations were replaced, e.g. tj and dj became c and j, respectively. For instance tjap ("brand" in Indonesian) became cap and Djakarta, the country's capital, became Jakarta.

Dutch-based creole languages spoken (now or formerly) in the Dutch East Indies include Javindo and Petjo, most of whose speakers were Indo or Eurasians. As a result of Indo emigration to the Netherlands following independence, the use of these languages declined.

The century and half of Dutch rule in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and southern India left few traces of the Dutch language. A few words such as tapal, kokin and kakhuis are still used in some of the Indian languages.


After the declaration of independence of Indonesia, Western New Guinea remained a Dutch colony until 1962, known as Netherlands New Guinea.[47] Despite prolonged Dutch presence, the Dutch language is not spoken by many Papuans, the colony having been ceded to Indonesia in 1963.

Immigrant communities can be found in Australia and New Zealand. The 2006 Australian census showed 36,179 people speaking Dutch at home.[48] At the 2006 New Zealand Census, 26,982 people, or 0.70 percent of the total population, reported to speak Dutch to sufficient fluency that they could hold an everyday conversation.[49]


The location of Suriname in South America.
The location of the Dutch Caribbean in the southern Caribbean.

In contrast to the colonies in the East Indies, from the second half of the 19th century onwards, the Netherlands envisaged expansion of Dutch in its colonies in the West Indies. Until 1863, when slavery was abolished in the West Indies, slaves were forbidden to speak Dutch. Most important were the efforts of Christianisation through Dutchification, which did not occur in Indonesia owing to a policy of non-involvement in the Islamised regions. Secondly, most of the people in the Colony of Surinam (now Suriname) worked on Dutch plantations, which reinforced the importance of Dutch as a means for direct communication.[44][50] In Indonesia, the colonial authorities had less interference in economic life. The size of the population was decisive: whereas the Antilles and Surinam combined only had a few hundred thousand inhabitants, Indonesia had many millions, by far outnumbering the population of the Netherlands.[44]


In Suriname, where in the second half of the 19th century the Dutch authorities introduced a policy of assimilation,[44] Dutch is the sole official language[51] and over 60 percent of the population speaks it as a mother tongue.[1] A further twenty-four percent of the population speaks Dutch as a second language.[52] Suriname gained its independence from the Netherlands in 1975 and has been an associate member of the Dutch Language Union since 2004.[53] The lingua franca of Suriname, however, is Sranan Tongo,[54] spoken natively by about a fifth of the population.[25][55]


In Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten, all parts of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Dutch is the official language but spoken as a first language by only 7% to 8% of the population,[56] although most native-born people on the islands can speak the language since the education system is in Dutch at some or all levels.[57] The lingua franca of Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao is Papiamento, a creole language that originally developed among the slave population. The population of the three northern Antilles, Sint Maarten, Saba, and Sint Eustatius, is predominantly English-speaking.[44]

North America

In New Jersey in the United States, an almost extinct dialect of Dutch, Jersey Dutch, spoken by descendants of 17th-century Dutch settlers in Bergen and Passaic counties, was still spoken as late as 1921.[58] Other Dutch-based creole languages once spoken in the Americas include Mohawk Dutch (in Albany, New York), Berbice (in Guyana), Skepi (in Essequibo, Guyana) and Negerhollands (in the United States Virgin Islands). Pennsylvania Dutch is not a member of the set of Dutch dialects and is less misleadingly called Pennsylvania German.[59]

Martin Van Buren, the eighth President of the United States, spoke Dutch as his first language and is the only U.S. President to have spoken a language other than English as his first language. Dutch prevailed for many generations as the dominant language in parts of New York along the Hudson River. Another famous American born in this region who spoke Dutch as a first language was Sojourner Truth.

According to the 2000 United States census, 150,396 people spoke Dutch at home,[60] while according to the 2006 Canadian census, this number reaches 160,000 Dutch speakers.[61] In Canada, Dutch is the fourth most spoken language by farmers, after English, French and German,[62] and the fifth most spoken non-official language overall (by 0.6% of Canadians).[63]


Belgian Africa

Belgium, which had gained its independence from the Netherlands in 1830, also held a colonial empire from 1901 to 1962, consisting of the Belgian Congo and Ruanda-Urundi. Unlike Belgium itself, the colonies had no de jure official language.[64][65] Although a majority of Belgians residing in the colonies were Dutch-speaking,[64] French was de facto the sole language used in administration, jurisdiction and secondary education.[66]

After World War II, proposals of dividing the colony into a French-speaking and a Dutch-speaking part—after the example of Belgium—were discussed within the Flemish Movement.[66][67] In general, however, the Flemish Movement was not as strong in the colonies as in the mother country.[68] Although in 1956, on the eve of Congolese independence, an estimated 50,000 out of a total of 80,000 Belgian nationals would have been Flemish,[64] only 1,305 out of 21,370 children were enrolled in Dutch-language education.[69]

When the call for a better recognition of Dutch in the colony got louder, the évolués ("developed Congolese")—among them Mobutu Sese Seko—argued that Dutch had no right over the indigenous languages, defending the privileged position of French.[64][69] Moreover, the image of Afrikaans as the language of the apartheid was injurious to the popularity of Dutch.[69]

The colonial authorities used Lingala, Kongo, Swahili and Tshiluba in communication with the local population and in education.[66] In Ruanda-Urundi this was Kirundi.[70] Knowledge of French—or, to an even lesser extent, Dutch—was hardly passed on to the natives,[64] of whom only a small number were taught French to work in local public services.[44] After their independence, French would become an official language of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Burundi.[70] Of these, Congo is the most francophone country. Knowledge of Dutch in former Belgian Africa is almost nonexistent, except for the people who have learned the language while living or being emigrants in Belgium.


The distribution of Afrikaans across South Africa: proportion of the population speaking Afrikaans in the home.
The distribution of Afrikaans across South Africa: density of Afrikaans home-language speakers.

The largest legacy of the Dutch language lies in South Africa, which attracted large numbers of Dutch, Flemish and other northwest European farmer (in Dutch, boer) settlers, all of whom were quickly assimilated.[71] The long isolation from the rest of the Dutch-speaking world made the Dutch as spoken in Southern Africa evolve into what was then Afrikaans.[72] In 1876, the first Afrikaans newspaper called Die Afrikaanse Patriot was published in the Cape Colony.[73]

European Dutch remained the literary language[72] until the start of the 1920s, when under pressure of Afrikaner nationalism the local "African" Dutch was preferred over the written, European-based standard.[71] In 1925, section 137 of the 1909 constitution of the Union of South Africa was amended by Act 8 of 1925, stating "the word Dutch in article 137 [...] is hereby declared to include Afrikaans".[74][75] The constitution of 1983 only listed English and Afrikaans as official languages. It is estimated that between 90% to 95% of Afrikaans vocabulary is ultimately of Dutch origin.[76][77]

Both languages are still largely mutually intelligible, although this relation can in some fields (such as lexicon, spelling and grammar) be asymmetric, as it is easier for Dutch speakers to understand written Afrikaans than it is for Afrikaans speakers to understand written Dutch.[78] Afrikaans is grammatically far less complex than Dutch, and vocabulary items are generally altered in a clearly patterned manner, e.g. vogel becomes voël ("bird") and regen becomes reën ("rain").[79]

It is the third language of South Africa in terms of native speakers (~13.5%),[80] of whom 53 percent are Coloureds and 42.4 percent Whites.[81] In 1996, 40 percent of South Africans reported to know Afrikaans at least at a very basic level of communication.[82] It is the lingua franca in Namibia,[71][83][84] where it is spoken natively in 11 percent of households.[85] In total, Afrikaans is the first language in South Africa alone of about 6.8 million people[80] and is estimated to be a second language for at least 10 million people worldwide,[86] compared to over 23 million[1] and 5 million respectively, for Dutch.[2]


The history of the Dutch language begins around AD 450–500 after Old Frankish, one of the many West Germanic tribal languages, was split by the Second Germanic consonant shift. At more or less the same time the Ingvaeonic nasal spirant law led to the development of the direct ancestors of modern Dutch Low Saxon, Frisian and English. The northern dialects of Old Frankish generally did not participate in either of these two shifts, except for a small amount of phonetic changes, and are hence known as Old Low Franconian; the "Low" refers to dialects not influenced by the consonant shift.

The most south-eastern dialects of the Franconian languages became part of High—though not UpperGerman even though a dialect continuum remained. The fact that Dutch did not undergo the sound changes may be the reason why some people say that Dutch is like a bridge between English and German. Within Old Low Franconian there were two subgroups: Old East Low Franconian and Old West Low Franconian, which is better known as Old Dutch.

East Low Franconian was eventually absorbed by Dutch as it became the dominant form of Low Franconian, although it remains a noticeable substrate within the southern Limburgish dialects of Dutch. As the two groups were so similar, it is often difficult to determine whether a text is Old Dutch or Old East Low Franconian; hence most linguists will generally use Old Dutch synonymously with Old Low Franconian and mostly do not differentiate.

Development phases

Dutch, like other Germanic languages, is conventionally divided into three development phases which were:

  • 1150–1500 Middle Dutch (Also called "Diets" in popular use, though not by linguists)
  • 1500–present Modern Dutch (Saw the creation of the Dutch standard language and includes contemporary Dutch)

The transition between these languages was very gradual and one of the few moments linguists can detect somewhat of a revolution is when the Dutch standard language emerged and quickly established itself. Standard Dutch is very similar to most Dutch dialects.

The development of the Dutch language is illustrated by the following sentence in Old, Middle and Modern Dutch:

"Irlôsin sol an frithe sêla mîna fan thên thia ginâcont mi, wanda under managon he was mit mi" (Old Dutch)
"Erlossen sal [hi] in vrede siele mine van dien die genaken mi, want onder menegen hi was met mi" (Middle Dutch)

(Using same word order)

"Verlossen zal hij in vrede ziel mijn van degenen die [te] na komen mij, want onder menigen hij was met mij" (Modern Dutch)

(Using correct contemporary Dutch word order)

"Hij zal mijn ziel in vrede verlossen van degenen die mij te na komen, want onder menigen was hij met mij" (Modern Dutch) (see Psalm 55:19)
"He shall my soul in peace free from those who me too near come, because amongst many was he with me" (English literal translation in the same word order)
"He will deliver my soul in peace from those who attack me, because, amongst many, he was with me" (English translation in unmarked word order) (see Psalm 55:18)

A process of standardisation started in the Middle Ages, especially under the influence of the Burgundian Ducal Court in Dijon (Brussels after 1477). The dialects of Flanders and Brabant were the most influential around this time. The process of standardisation became much stronger at the start of the 16th century, mainly based on the urban dialect of Antwerp. In 1585 Antwerp fell to the Spanish army: many fled to the Northern Netherlands, especially the province of Holland, where they influenced the urban dialects of that province. In 1637, a further important step was made towards a unified language, when the Statenvertaling, the first major Bible translation into Dutch, was created that people from all over the United Provinces could understand. It used elements from various, even Dutch Low Saxon, dialects but was predominantly based on the urban dialects of Holland of post 16th century which in turn were heavily influenced by the 16th century dialects of Brabant. Brabantian has had a large influence on the development of Standard Dutch. This was because of Brabant was being the dominant region in the Netherlands when standardization of the Dutch started in the 16th century. The first major formation of standard Dutch also took place in Antwerp, where a Brabantian dialect is spoken.[87]



This section gives only a general overview of the phonemes of Dutch. For further details on different realisations of phonemes, dialectal differences and example words, see the full article at Dutch phonology.


Like most Germanic languages, the Dutch consonant system did not undergo the High German consonant shift and has a syllable structure that allows fairly complex consonant clusters. Dutch also retains full use of the velar fricatives that were present in Proto-Germanic, but lost or modified in many other Germanic languages.

Dutch has final-obstruent devoicing: at the end of a word, voicing distinction is neutralised and all obstruents are pronounced voiceless. For example, goede ("good") is /ˈɣudə/ but the related form goed is /ɣut/.

  Bilabial Labio-
Alveolar Post-
Nasal m n ŋ
Plosive p b t d k ɡ (ʔ)
Fricative f v s z ʃ ʒ x ɣ ɦ
Trill r
Approximant ʋ l j


  • [ʔ] is not a separate phoneme in Dutch, but is inserted before vowel-initial syllables within words after /a/ and /ə/ and often also at the beginning of a word.
  • The realization of /r/ phoneme varies considerably from dialect to dialect and even between speakers in the same dialect area. Common realisations are an alveolar trill [r], alveolar tap [ɾ], uvular trill [ʀ], voiced uvular fricative [ʁ], and alveolar approximant [ɹ].
  • The realization of /ʋ/ also varies somewhat by area and speaker. The main realisation is a labiodental approximant [ʋ], but some speakers, particularly in the south, use a bilabial approximant [β̞] or a labiovelar approximant [w].
  • The lateral /l/ is slightly velarized postvocalically in most dialects, particularly in the north.[88]
  • /x/ and /ɣ/ may be true velars [x] and [ɣ], uvular [χ] and [ʁ] or palatal [ç] and [ʝ]. The more palatal realisations are common in southern areas, while uvulars are common in the north.
  • Some northern dialects have a tendency to devoice all fricatives regardless of environment. This is particularly common with /ɣ/ but can affect others as well.
  • /ʃ/ and /ʒ/ are not native phonemes of Dutch, and usually occur in borrowed words, like show and bagage ('baggage').
  • /ɡ/ is not a native phoneme of Dutch and only occurs in borrowed words, like goal.


Dutch has an extensive vowel inventory, as is common for Germanic languages. Vowels can be grouped as back rounded, front unrounded and front rounded. They are also traditionally distinguished by length or tenseness.

Vowel length is not always considered a distinctive feature in Dutch phonology, because it normally co-occurs with changes in vowel quality. One feature or the other may be considered redundant, and some phonemic analyses prefer to treat it as an opposition of tenseness. However, even if not considered part of the phonemic opposition, the long/tense vowels are still realised as phonetically longer than their short counterparts. The changes in vowel quality are also not always the same in all dialects, and in some there may be little difference at all, with length remaining the primary distinguishing feature. And while it is true that older words always pair vowel length with a change in vowel quality, new loanwords have reintroduced phonemic oppositions of length. Compare zonne(n) [ˈzɔnə] ("suns") versus zone [ˈzɔːnə] ("zone") versus zonen [ˈzoːnə(n)] ("sons"), or kroes [krus] ("mug") versus cruise [kruːs] ("cruise").

Short/lax vowels
Central Back
Close ɪ ʏ
Mid ɛ ə ɔ
Open ɑ
Long/tense vowels
Close i ~ y ~ u ~
Close-mid øː
Open-mid (ɛː) (œː) (ɔː)


  • The distinction between /i y u/ and /iː yː uː/ is only slight, and may be considered allophonic for most purposes. However, some recent loanwords have introduced distinctively long /iː yː uː/, making the length distinction marginally phonemic.
  • The long close-mid vowels /eː øː oː/ are realised as slightly closing diphthongs /[eɪ øʏ oʊ] in many northern dialects.
  • The long open-mid vowels /ɛː œː ɔː/ only occur in a handful of loanwords, mostly from French.
  • The long close and close-mid vowels are often pronounced more closed or as centering diphthongs before an /r/ in the syllable coda. This may occur before coda /l/ as well.

Dutch also has several diphthongs. All of them end in a close vowel (/i y u/), but may begin with a variety of other vowels. They are grouped here by their first element.

Short/lax diphthongs
Mid ɛi œy (ɔi)
Open ɑu (ɑi)
Long/tense diphthongs
Close iu yu ui
Mid eːu oːi
Open aːi


  • /ɛi œy ɑu/ are the most common diphthongs and commonly the only ones considered "true" phonemes in Dutch. /ɑi/ and /ɔi/ are rare and occur only in some words. The "long/tense" diphthongs, while they are indeed realised as proper diphthongs, are generally analysed phonemically as a long/tense vowel followed by a glide /j/ or /ʋ/.


The syllable structure of Dutch is (C)(C)(C)V(C)(C)(C)(C). Many words, as in English, begin with three consonants; for example, straat /straːt/ (street). There are words that end in four consonants, e.g., herfst /ɦɛrfst/ 'autumn', ergst /ɛrxst/ 'worst', interessantst 'most interesting', sterkst /stɛrkst/ 'strongest', the last three of which are superlative adjectives.

The highest number of consonants in a single cluster is found in the word slechtstschrijvend /ˈslɛxtstˌsxrɛi̯vənt/ 'writing worst' with 7 consonant phonemes. Similar is angstschreeuw     "scream in fear", with six in a row. The pronunciation of a word can differ greatly from its written form: in slechtstschrijvend the cluster is usually reduced because of assimilation /sts/ > [s(ː)], or further by reducing /sxr/ > [sr]. The word angstschreeuw is similarly reduced to [ˈɑŋsxreːu̯] or [ˈɑŋsreːu̯].

Polder Dutch

A notable change in pronunciation has been occurring in younger generations in the provinces of Utrecht, North and South Holland, which has been dubbed "Polder Dutch" by Jan Stroop.[89] The diphthongs spelt ij, ou, and ui are pronounced not as /ɛi/, /ʌu/, and /œy/, but lowered, as [ai], [au], and [ay] respectively. Instead, /eː/, /oː/, and /øː/ are pronounced as diphthongs now, as [ɛi], [ɔu], and [œy] respectively, which makes this change an instance of a chain shift.

This change is interesting from a sociolinguistic point of view because it has apparently happened relatively recently, in the 1970s, and was pioneered by older well-educated women from the upper middle classes.[90] The lowering of the diphthongs has long been current in many Dutch dialects, and is comparable to the English Great Vowel Shift, and the diphthongisation of long high vowels in Modern High German, which centuries earlier reached the state now found in Polder Dutch. Stroop theorizes that the lowering of open-mid to open diphthongs is a phonetically "natural" and inevitable development and that Dutch, after having diphthongised the long high vowels like German and English, "should" have lowered the diphthongs like German and English as well.

Instead, he argues, this development has been artificially frozen in an "intermediate" state by the standardisation of Dutch pronunciation in the 16th century, where lowered diphthongs found in rural dialects were perceived as ugly by the educated classes and accordingly declared substandard. Now, however, in his opinion, the newly affluent and independent women can afford to let that natural development take place in their speech. Stroop compares the role of Polder Dutch with the urban variety of British English pronunciation called Estuary English.

Among Belgian Dutch speakers and speakers from other regions in the Netherlands, this vowel shift is not taking place, as the diphthongs /ɛi/, /ɔu/ and /œy/ are often pronounced as the monophthongs [ɛː], [ɔː] and [œː]. Speakers using such pronunciations have no phonemic diphthongs in their inventory.


Dutch is grammatically similar to German, such as in syntax and verb morphology (for a comparison of verb morphology in English, Dutch and German, see Germanic weak verb and Germanic strong verb). Dutch has grammatical cases, but these are now mostly limited to pronouns and a large number of set phrases. Inflected forms of the articles are also often found in surnames and toponyms.

Standard Dutch has three genders: masculine, feminine and neuter. In general, Belgian speakers distinguish masculine and feminine words (see Gender in Dutch). This three gender system is similar to the one in German. For most non-Belgian speakers, the masculine and feminine genders have merged to form the common gender (de), while the neuter (het) remains distinct as before. This gender system is similar to those of most Continental Scandinavian languages. As in English, but to a lesser degree, the inflectional grammar of the language (e.g., adjective and noun endings) has simplified over time.

Genders and cases

The table of definite articles below demonstrates that contemporary Dutch is less complex than German. The article has just two forms, de and het, more complex than English, which has only "the". The use of the older inflected form den in the dative or accusative as well as use of 'der' in the dative are restricted to numerous set phrases, surnames and toponyms.

Dutch German
Masculine singular Feminine singular Neuter singular Plural (any gender) Masculine singular Feminine singular Neuter singular Plural (any gender)
Nominative de de het de der die das die
Genitive des / van de der / van de des / van het der / van de des der des der
Dative de de het de dem der dem den
Accusative de de het de den die das die

In modern Dutch, the genitive articles 'des' and 'der' are only commonly used in idioms. Other usage is typically considered archaic or poetic. In most circumstances, the preposition 'van' is instead used, followed by the normal definitive article 'de' or 'het'. For the idiomatic use of the articles in the genitive, see for example:

  • Masculine singular: "des duivels" (litt: of the devil) (common proverbial meaning: Seething with rage)
  • Feminine singular: het woordenboek der Friese taal (the dictionary of the Frisian language)
  • Neuter singular: de vrouw des huizes (the lady of the house)
  • Plural: de voortgang der werken (the progress of (public) works)

In contemporary usage, the genitive case still occurs a little more often with plurals than with singulars, as the plural article is 'der' for all genders and no special noun inflection must be taken account of. 'Der' is commonly used in order to avoid reduplication of 'van', e.g. het merendeel der gedichten van de auteur instead of het merendeel van de gedichten van de auteur ("the bulk of the author's poems").

There are also genitive forms for the pronoun die/dat ("that [one], those [ones]"), namely diens for masculine and neuter singulars and dier for feminine singular and all plurals. Although usually avoided in common speech, these forms can be used instead of possessive pronouns to avoid confusion. Compare:

  • Hij vertelde van zijn zoon en zijn vrouw. – He told about his son and his (own) wife.
  • Hij vertelde van zijn zoon en diens vrouw. – He told about his son and the latter's wife.

Analogically, the relative and interrogative pronoun wie ("who") has the genitive forms wiens and wier (corresponding to English "whose", but less frequent in use).

Dutch also has a range of fixed expressions that make use of the genitive articles, which can be abbreviated using apostrophes. Common examples include "'s ochtends" (with 's as abbreviation of des; in the morning) and "desnoods" (lit: of the need, translated: if necessary).

The Dutch written grammar has simplified over the past 100 years: cases are now mainly used for the pronouns, such as ik (I), mij, me (me), mijn (my), wie (who), wiens (whose: masculine or neuter singular), wier (whose: feminine singular, masculine or feminine plural). Nouns and adjectives are not case inflected (except for the genitive of proper nouns (names): -s, -'s or -'). In the spoken language cases and case inflections had already gradually disappeared from a much earlier date on (probably the 15th century) as in many continental West Germanic dialects.

Inflection of adjectives is more complicated. The adjective receives no ending with indefinite neuter nouns in singular (as with een /ən/ 'a/an'), and -e in all other cases. (This was also the case in Middle English, as in "a goode man".) Note that fiets belongs to the masculine/feminine category, and that water and huis are neuter. Water has no plural form.

Masculine singular or feminine singular Neuter singular Plural (any gender)
(with definite article
or pronoun)
de mooie fiets (the beautiful bicycle) het mooie huis (the beautiful house)
de mooie fietsen (the beautiful bicycles)
de mooie huizen (the beautiful houses)
(with indefinite article or
no article and no pronoun)
een mooie fiets (a beautiful bicycle)
koude soep (cold soup)
een mooi huis (a beautiful house)
koud water (cold water)
mooie fietsen (beautiful bicycles)
mooie huizen (beautiful houses)

An adjective has no e if it is in the predicative: De soep is koud.

More complex inflection is still found in certain lexicalized expressions like de heer des huizes (literally, the man of the house), etc. These are usually remnants of cases (in this instance, the genitive case which is still used in German, cf. Der Herr des Hauses) and other inflections no longer in general use today. In such lexicalized expressions remnants of strong and weak nouns can be found too, e.g. in het jaar des Heren (Anno Domini), where "-en" is actually the genitive ending of the weak noun. Also in this case, German retains this feature.

The developments of the Dutch and German case systems, however, are quite oppositional inasmuch as the genitive is the only case that is retained in modern Dutch—albeit to a limited degree—while the distinction between nominative, dative and accusative is lost completely (except in personal pronouns and fixed expressions). In German, on the contrary, the genitive is the only case that is widely avoided colloquially (and becoming less frequent in writing too) while the other three cases are distinguished throughout all registers of modern standard German.

Word order

Dutch exhibits subject–object–verb word order, but in main clauses the conjugated verb is moved into the second position in what is known as verb second or V2 word order. This makes Dutch word order almost identical to that of German, but often different from English, which has subject–verb–object word order and has since lost the V2 word order that existed in Old English.[91]

An example sentence used in some Dutch language courses and textbooks is "Ik kan mijn pen niet vinden omdat het veel te donker is", which translates into English word for word as "I can my pen not find because it far too dark is", but in standard English word order would be written "I cannot find my pen because it is far too dark". If the sentence is split into a main and subclause and the verbs highlighted, the logic behind the word order can be seen.

Main clause: "Ik kan mijn pen niet vinden "
Verbs are placed in the final position, but the conjugated verb, in this case "kan" (can), is made the second element of the clause.

Subclause: "omdat het veel te donker is "
The verb or verbs always go in the final position.

In an interrogative main clause the usual word order is: conjugated verb followed by subject; other verbs in final position: "Kun jij je pen niet vinden?" (literally "Can you your pen not find?") "Can't you find your pen?"
In the Dutch equivalent of a wh-question the word order is: interrogative pronoun (or expression) + conjugated verb + subject; other verbs in final position: "Waarom kun jij je pen niet vinden?" ("Why can you your pen not find?") "Why can't you find your pen?""
In a tag question the word order is the same as in a declarative clause: "Jij kunt je pen niet vinden?" ("You can your pen not find?") "You can't find your pen?""
A subordinate clause does not change its word order: "Kun jij je pen niet vinden omdat het veel te donker is?" ("Can you your pen not find because it far too dark is?") "Can you not find your pen because it's too dark?""


Dutch nouns can take endings for size: -je for singular diminutive and -jes for plural diminutive. Between these suffixes and the radical can come extra letters depending on the ending of the word:

boom (tree) – boompje
ring (ring) – ringetje
koning (king) – koninkje
tien (ten) – tientje (a ten euro note)

These diminutives are very common. As in German, all diminutives are neuter. In the case of words like "het meisje" (the girl), this is different from the natural gender. A diminutive ending can also be appended to an adverb or adjective (but not when followed by a noun).

klein (little, small) – een kleintje (a small one)


Like most Germanic languages, Dutch forms noun compounds, where the first noun modifies the category given by the second (hondenhok = doghouse). Unlike English, where newer compounds or combinations of longer nouns are often written in open form with separating spaces, Dutch (like the other Germanic languages) either uses the closed form without spaces (boomhuis = tree house) or inserts a hyphen (VVD-coryfee = outstanding member of the VVD, a political party). Like German, Dutch allows arbitrarily long compounds, but the longer they get, the less frequent they tend to be.

The longest serious entry in the Van Dale dictionary is     (ceasefire negotiation). Leafing through the articles of association (Statuten) one may come across a 30-letter     (authorisation of representation). An even longer word cropping up in official documents is ziektekostenverzekeringsmaatschappij (health insurance company) though the shorter ziektekostenverzekeraar (health insurer) is more common.

Notwithstanding official spelling rules, some Dutch people, like some Scandinavians, nowadays tend to write the parts of a compound separately, a practice sometimes dubbed de Engelse ziekte (the English disease).[92][93]


Dutch vocabulary is predominantly Germanic in origin, considerably more so than English. This difference is mainly due to the heavy influence of Norman on English, and to Dutch patterns of word formation, such as the tendency to form long and sometimes very complicated compound nouns, being more similar to those of German and the Scandinavian languages. The Dutch vocabulary is one of the richest in the world and comprises at least 268,826 headwords.[94] In addition, the Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal (English: "Dictionary of the Dutch Language") is the largest dictionary in the world in print and has over 430,000 entries of Dutch words.[95]

Like English, Dutch includes words of Greek and Latin origin. French has also contributed a large number of words, most of which have entered into Dutch vocabulary via the Netherlands and not via Belgium, in spite of the cultural and economic dominance exerted by French speakers in Belgium until the first half of the 20th century. This happened because the status French enjoyed as the language of refinement and high culture inspired the affluent upper and upper-middle classes in the Netherlands to adopt many French terms into the language.

In Belgium no such phenomenon occurred, since members of the upper and upper-middle classes would have spoken French rather than Frenchify their Dutch. French terms heavily influenced Dutch dialects in Flanders, but Belgian speakers did (and do) tend to resist French loanwords when using standard Dutch. Nonetheless some French loanwords of relatively recent date have become accepted in standard Dutch, also in Belgium, albeit with a shift in meaning and not as straight synonyms for existing Dutch words. For example, "blesseren" (from French blesser, to injure) is almost exclusively used to refer to sports injuries, while in other contexts the standard Dutch verbs "kwetsen" and "verwonden" continue to be used.

Especially on the streets and in many professions, there is a steady increase of English loanwords, rather often pronounced or applied in a different way (see Dutch pseudo-anglicisms). The influx of English words is maintained by the dominance of English in the mass media and on the Internet.

The most important dictionary of the modern Dutch language is the Van Dale groot woordenboek der Nederlandse taal,[96] more commonly referred to as the Dikke van Dale ("dik" means "thick"). However, it is dwarfed by the 45,000-page Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal, a scholarly endeavour that took 147 years from initial idea to first edition.

Writing system

Dutch uses one additional character beyond the standard alphabet, the digraph IJ.
Linebus (nl) road marking in Amsterdam

Dutch is written using the Latin script. Dutch uses one additional character beyond the standard alphabet, the digraph IJ. It has a relatively high proportion of doubled letters, both vowels and consonants, due to the formation of compound words and also to the spelling devices for distinguishing the many vowel sounds in the Dutch language. An example of five consecutive doubled letters is the word voorraaddoos (food storage container).

The diaeresis (Dutch: trema) is used to mark vowels that are pronounced separately. In the most recent spelling reform, a hyphen has replaced the diaeresis in compound words (i.e., if the vowels originate from separate words, not from prefixes or suffixes), e.g. zeeëend (seaduck) is now spelled zee-eend.

The acute accent occurs mainly in loanwords like café, but can also be used for emphasis or to differentiate between two forms. Its most common use is to differentiate between the indefinite article 'een' (a, an) and the numeral 'één' (one); also 'hé' (hey, also written 'hee').

The grave accent is used to clarify pronunciation ('hè' [what?, what the ...?, tag question 'eh?'], 'bèta') and in loanwords ('caissière' [female cashier], 'après-ski'). In the recent spelling reform, the accent grave was dropped as stress sign on short vowels in favour of the acute accent (e.g. 'wèl' was changed to 'wél').

Other diacritical marks such as the circumflex only occur in a few words, most of them loanwords from French. The characters 'Ç', 'ç', 'Ñ' or 'ñ' can also be found in the Dutch language but the words that contain one of these characters are loanwords too and these words are inherited from Spain and Portugal. They don't occur very often.

The official spelling is set by the Wet schrijfwijze Nederlandsche taal (Law on the writing of the Dutch language; Belgium 1946, Netherlands 1947; based on a 1944 spelling revision; both amended in the 1990s after a 1995 spelling revision). The Woordenlijst Nederlandse taal, more commonly known as "het groene boekje" (i.e. "the green booklet", because of its colour), is usually accepted as an informal explanation of the law. However, the official 2005 spelling revision, which reversed some of the 1995 changes and made new ones, has been welcomed with a distinct lack of enthusiasm in both the Netherlands and Belgium. As a result, the Genootschap Onze Taal[97] (Our Language Society) decided to publish an alternative list, "het witte boekje" ("the white booklet"), which tries to simplify some complicated rules and offers several possible spellings for many contested words. This alternative orthography is followed by a number of major Dutch media organisations but mostly ignored in Belgium.

Dutch as a foreign language

As a foreign language, Dutch is mainly taught in primary and secondary schools in areas adjacent to the Netherlands and Flanders. In French-speaking Belgium, over 300,000 pupils are enrolled in Dutch courses, followed by over 20,000 in the German states of Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia, and over 7,000 in the French region of Nord-Pas de Calais (of which 4,550 are in primary school).[98] Dutch is the obligatory medium of instruction in schools in Suriname, even for non-native speakers.[99] Dutch is taught in various educational centres in Indonesia, the most important of which is the Erasmus Language Centre (ETC) in Jakarta. Each year, some 1,500 to 2,000 students take Dutch courses there.[100] In total, several thousand Indonesians study Dutch as a foreign language.[101]

At an academic level, Dutch is taught in over 225 universities in more than 40 countries. About 10,000 students worldwide study Dutch at university.[42] The largest number of faculties of neerlandistiek can be found in Germany (30 universities), followed by France and the United States (20 each). Five universities in the United Kingdom offer the study of Dutch.[98][102] Owing to centuries of Dutch rule in Indonesia, many old documents are written in Dutch. Many universities therefore include Dutch as a source language, mainly for law and history students.[41] In Indonesia this involves about 35,000 students.[42] In South Africa, the number is difficult to estimate, since the academic study of Afrikaans inevitably includes the study of Dutch.[42] Elsewhere in the world, the number of people learning Dutch is relatively small.

Popular misconceptions

The language of Flanders

Dutch is the language of government, education, and daily life in Flanders, the northern part of Belgium. There is no officially recognized language called "Flemish", and both the Dutch and Belgian governments adhere to the standard Dutch (Algemeen Nederlands) defined by the Nederlandse Taalunie ("Dutch Language Union").

The actual differences between the spoken standard language of Dutch and Belgian speakers are comparable to the differences between American and British English or the German spoken in Germany and Austria. In other words, most differences are rather a matter of accent than of grammar. Some of these differences are recognized by the Taalunie and major dictionaries as being interchangeably valid, although some dictionaries and grammars may mark them as being more prevalent in one region or the other.

The use of the word Vlaams ("Flemish") to describe Standard Dutch for the variations prevalent in Flanders and used there, is common in the Netherlands and Belgium.

Dutch and German as sister languages

The dialect group from which Dutch is largely derived, Low Franconian, belongs to the whole of the continental West Germanic dialect set. This whole is sometimes imprecisely indicated by the word "German", but it might as well be called "Dutch". Indeed the Low Franconian dialects and languages are morphologically closer to the original form of Western Germanic than the High German from which standard German is derived. It is quite appropriate to call modern Dutch and High German sister languages, only they are derived not from one and the same common variety, but from cognate mother vernaculars of Continental West Germanic. The view about mutual intelligibility between Dutch and German varies.[8][9]

No intrinsic quality of the whole of the component dialects favours one standard over the other: both were rivals and historical contingency decided the range of their use. The state border does not reflect dialectal subdivisions. Only since the dialect continuum of continental West Germanic was broken by the 19th century introduction of mass education have the respective ranges been fixed; in the 18th century standard Dutch was still used as the normal written standard in the Lower Rhine, the county of Bentheim and East Frisia, now all part of Germany. See also Meuse-Rhenish.

Low Dietsch

Low Dietsch (Dutch: Platdiets, Limburgish: Platduutsj, French: Thiois or Platdutch) is a term mainly used within the Flemish terminology for the transitional Limburgish-Ripuarian dialects of a number of towns and villages in the north-east of the Belgian province of Liege, such as Gemmenich, Homburg, Montzen and Welkenraedt.

Dutch and English as sister languages

Dutch has a relatively close genetic relationship to the descendants of Old and Middle English (such as English and Scots), though less than the Frisian languages have to English. Both Dutch and English belong to the West Germanic languages and both lack most or all of the High German consonant shift that characterizes the descendants of Middle High German (such as German and Yiddish). Because of their close common relationship many English words are essentially identical to their Dutch lexical counterparts, either in spelling (begin,) or pronunciation (boek = book, diep = deep), or both (lip); these cognates or in other ways related words are excluded from this list. Though Dutch and English are relatively closely related, Dutch is less influenced by the French language and therefore contains fewer French loan words than the English language.

Pennsylvania Dutch

Pennsylvania Dutch, a West Central German variety called Deitsch by its speakers, is not a form of Dutch. The word "Dutch" has historically been used for all speakers of continental West Germanic languages, including, the Dutch people, Flemish, Austrians, Germans, and the German-speaking Swiss. It is cognate with the Dutch archaism Diets, meaning "Dutch", and the German self-designation Deutsch. The use of the term "Dutch" exclusively for the language of Belgium, or for the inhabitants of the Netherlands or some of its former colonies, dates from the early 16th century. The name "Dutch" for the Pennsylvania dialect also stems from the way "Deutsch" is pronounced in the dialect itself.

Pennsylvania Dutch must not be confused with Jersey Dutch as spoken in Upstate New York in former ages, and even until the 1950s in New Jersey, being Dutch-based creole or pidgin languages.

Dutch, not Deutsch

The resemblance of the English-language word "Dutch" (referring to the language spoken in the Netherlands and Flanders) and the Dutch-language word Duits and German-language word Deutsch (meaning the language spoken in Germany, Austria, and much of Switzerland) is not accidental, since both derive from the Germanic word þiudiskaz ("of the people, popular, vulgar, vernacular"; that is, as opposed to Latin).

Until roughly the 16th century, speakers of all the varieties of West Germanic from the mouth of the Rhine to the Alps had been accustomed to refer to their native speech as the vernacular. This was Dietsch or Duitsch in Middle Dutch and what would eventually stabilize as Deutsch further south.

English-speakers took the word Duitsch from their nearest Germanic-speaking neighbours in the Low Countries, and having anglicized it as Dutch[103] used it to refer to those neighbours and to the language they spoke. Meanwhile, however, especially after their secession from the Holy Roman Empire (i.e., Germany) in 1648, the Dutch began increasingly to refer to their own language as Nederlandsch (from which today's Nederlands) in distinction from the people and speech of the Empire itself – Duitsch (now Duits) – with the result that 'Dutch' and Deutsch now refer to two different languages. About that time (as in Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels), the English called Dutch "Low Dutch" and German "High Dutch", but eventually "German" won out over "High Dutch" due to the German-speaking territories being known as "Germany"[104] named after Germania.

See also


  1. ^ In France, a historical dialect called French Flemish is spoken. There are about 80,000 Dutch speakers in France; see Simpson 2009, p. 307. In French Flanders, only a remnant of between 50,000 to 100,000 Flemish-speakers remain; see Berdichevsky 2004, p. 90. Flemish is spoken in the north-west of France by an estimated population of 20,000 daily speakers and 40,000 occasional speakers; see European Commission 2010.
    A dialect continuum exists between Dutch and German through the South Guelderish and Limburgish dialects.
    In 1941, 400,000 Indonesians spoke Dutch, and Dutch exerted a major influence on Indonesian; see Sneddon 2003, p. 161. In 1941, about 0.5% of the inland population had a reasonable knowledge of Dutch; see Maier 2005, p. 12. At the beginning of World War II, about one million Asians had an active command of Dutch and an additional half million had a passive knowledge; see Jones 2008, p. xxxi. Many older Indonesians speak Dutch as a second language; see Thomson 2003, p. 80. Some of the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia speak Dutch amongst each other; see Tan 2008, pp. 62–64, Erdentuğ & Colombijn 2002, p. 104. Dutch is spoken by "smaller groups of speakers" in Indonesia; see Bussmann 2002, p. 83. Some younger Indonesians learn Dutch as a foreign language because their parents and grandparents may speak it and because in some circles, Dutch is regarded as the language of the elite; see Vos 2001, p. 91. At present, only educated people of the oldest generation, in addition to specialists for which knowledge of the language is required, can speak Dutch fluently; see Ammon 2006, p. 2017. Around 25% of present-day Indonesian vocabulary can be traced back to Dutch words, see Maier 2005, p. 17.
  2. ^ 410,000 in USA, 159,000 in Canada, 47,000 in Australia; see Simpson 2009, p. 307. Between 200,000 and 400,000 in USA alone; see McGoldrick, Giordano & Garcia-Preto 2005, p. 536.
  3. ^ Afrikaans is a daughter language of Dutch; see Booij 1995, p. 2, Jansen, Schreuder & Neijt 2007, p. 5, Mennen, Levelt & Gerrits 2006, p. 1, Booij 2003, p. 4, Hiskens, Auer & Kerswill 2005, p. 19, Heeringa & de Wet 2007, pp. 1, 3, 5.
    Afrikaans was historically called Cape Dutch; see Deumert & Vandenbussche 2003, p. 16, Conradie 2005, p. 208, Sebba 1997, p. 160, Langer & Davies 2005, p. 144, Deumert 2002, p. 3, Berdichevsky 2004, p. 130.
    Afrikaans is rooted in 17th century dialects of Dutch; see Holm 1989, p. 338, Geerts & Clyne 1992, p. 71, Mesthrie 1995, p. 214, Niesler, Louw & Roux 2005, p. 459.
    Afrikaans is variously described as a creole, a partially creolised language, or a deviant variety of Dutch; see Sebba 2007, p. 116.
  4. ^ It has the widest geographical and racial distribution of all official languages of South Africa; see Webb 2003, pp. 7, 8, Berdichevsky 2004, p. 131. It has by far the largest geographical distribution; see Alant 2004, p. 45.
    It is widely spoken and understood as a second or third language; see Deumert & Vandenbussche 2003, p. 16, Kamwangamalu 2004, p. 207, Myers-Scotton 2006, p. 389, Simpson 2008, p. 324, Palmer 2001, p. 141, Webb 2002, p. 74, Herriman & Burnaby 1996, p. 18, Page & Sonnenburg 2003, p. 7, Brook Napier 2007, pp. 69, 71.
    An estimated 40 percent of South Africans have at least a basic level of communication in Afrikaans; see Webb 2003, p. 7 McLean & McCormick 1996, p. 333. Afrikaans is a lingua franca of Namibia; see Deumert 2004, p. 1, Adegbija 1994, p. 26, Batibo 2005, p. 79, Donaldson 1993, p. xiii, Deumert & Vandenbussche 2003, p. 16, Baker & Prys Jones 1997, p. 364, Domínguez & López 1995, p. 399, Page & Sonnenburg 2003, p. 8, CIA 2010.
    While the number of total speakers of Afrikaans is unknown, estimates range between 15 and 23 million. Afrikaans has 16.3 million speakers; see de Swaan 2001, p. 216. Afrikaans has a total of 16 million speakers; see Machan 2009, p. 174. About 9 million people speak Afrikaans as a second or third language; see Alant 2004, p. 45, Proost 2006, p. 402. Afrikaans has over 5 million native speakers and 15 million second language speakers; see Réguer 2004, p. 20. Afrikaans has about 6 million native and 16 million second language speakers; see Domínguez & López 1995, p. 340. In South Africa, over 23 million people speak Afrikaans, of which a third are first-language speakers; see Page & Sonnenburg 2003, p. 7. L2 "Black Afrikaans" is spoken, with different degrees of fluency, by an estimated 15 million; see Stell 2008–11, p. 1.
    Dutch and Afrikaans share mutual intelligibility; see Gooskens 2007, p. 453, Holm 1989, p. 338, Baker & Prys Jones 1997, p. 302, Egil Breivik & Håkon Jahr 1987, p. 232. For written mutual intelligibility; see Sebba 2007, p. 116, Sebba 1997, p. 161.
    It is easier for Dutch speakers to understand Afrikaans than the other way around; see Gooskens 2007, p. 454.
  5. ^ Dutch and English are the closest relatives of German; see Abraham 2006, p. 124. Dutch is the closest relative of German; see Czepluch & Abraham 2004, p. 13. Dutch and English are closely related; see Ingram 1989, p. 494, Todd 2004, p. 37, Kager 1989, p. 105, Hogg 2002, p. 134, De Bot, Lowie & Verspoor 2005, pp. 130, 166, Weissenborn & Höhle 2001, p. 209, Crisma & Longobarde 2009, p. 250. Dutch and English are very closely related languages; see Fitzpatrick 2007, p. 188. Dutch is, after Frisian, the closest relative of English; see Mallory & Adams 2006, p. 23, Classe 2000, p. 390, Hogg 2002, p. 3, Denning, Kessler & Leben 2007, p. 22. English is most closely related to Dutch; see Lightfoot 1999, p. 22, and more so than to German; see Sonnenschein 2008, p. 100, Kennedy Wyld 2009, p. 190.
  6. ^ Dutch is traditionally described as morphologically between English and German, but syntactically closer to German; see Clyne 2003, p. 133. Dutch has been positioned to be between English and German; see Putnam 2011, p. 108, Bussmann 2002, p. 83, Müller 1995, p. 121, Onysko & Michel 2010, p. 210. Typologically, Dutch takes a midway position between English and German, having a similar word order to that of German, having grammatical gender, and a largely Germanic vocabulary. It is however morphologically close to English, and the case system and subjunctive have largely fallen out of use; see Swan & Smith 2001, p. 6.
  7. ^ Dutch shares with English its simplified morphology and the abandonment of the grammatical case system; see Booij 1995, p. 1, Simpson 2009, p. 309. In contrast to German, case markings have become vestigial in English and Dutch; see Hogg 2002, p. 134, Abraham 2006, p. 118, Bussmann 2002, p. 83, Swan & Smith 2001, p. 6. The umlaut in Dutch and English matured to a much lesser extent than in German; see Simpson 2009, p. 307, Lass 1994, p. 70, Deprez 1997, p. 251.
  8. ^ Dutch has effectively two genders; see Booij 1995, p. 1, Simpson 2009, p. 309, De Vogelaer 2009, p. 71. Grammatical gender has little grammatical consequences in Dutch; see Bussmann 2002, p. 84
  9. ^ Simpson 2009, p. 307, Booij 1995, p. 1. Dutch and German not have a strict SVO order as in English; see Hogg 2002, pp. 87, 134. In contrast to English, which has SVO as the underlying word order, for Dutch and German this is SV1OV2 or (in subordinate clauses) SOV; see Ingram 1989, p. 495, Jordens & Lalleman 1988, pp. 149, 150, 177. Dutch has almost the same word order as German; see Swan & Smith 2001, p. 6.
  10. ^ Dutch vocabulary has more Germanic words than English and more Romance words than German; see Simpson 2009, p. 309, Swan & Smith 2001, p. 17. Dutch vocabulary is mostly Germanic; see Swan & Smith 2001, p. 6. Dutch has the most similar vocabulary to English; see Mallory & Adams 2006, p. 1.


  1. ^ a b c d "Nederlands, wereldtaal" (in Nederlands). Nederlandse Taalunie. 2010. Retrieved 2011-04-07. 
  2. ^ a b c   "1% of the EU population claims to speak Dutch well enough in order to have a conversation." (page 153)
  3. ^ a b Dutch language. University of Leicester. Retrieved 30 June 2014.
  4. ^ Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Modern Dutch". Glottolog 2.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 
  5. ^ "Netherlandic language - Encyclopedia Britannica". Retrieved 2014-06-11. 
  6. ^ Especially maintained in written language; cf. W. Haeseryn et al. (eds.), Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (2nd ed., 1997), 160–161.
  7. ^ [1]
  8. ^ a b Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An ... - Hans Henrich Hock, Brian D. Joseph - Google Boeken. 2009-08-17. Retrieved 2014-06-11. 
  9. ^ a b Beerkens, Roos (2010). Receptive Multilingualism as a Language Mode in the Dutch-German Border Area. Waxmann Publishing Co. p. 51.  
  10. ^ Britannica on Netherlandic Language; see also C.B. van Haeringen, Netherlandic language research. Men and works in the study of Dutch, 2nd edition, Leiden: Brill 1960.
  11. ^ Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd revised edn., s.v. "Dutch" (Random House Reference, 2005).
  12. ^ "Dutch", in Encyclopedia of the Languages of Europe, ed. Glanville Price (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), 129.
  13. ^ Until World War II, Nederlands rivaled Diets as the language's designation. However the similarity to Deutsch resulted in its disuse when the German occupiers and Dutch fascists appropriated and made extensive use of Diets to stress the Dutch as an ancient Germanic people.
  14. ^ Price, Encyc. Langs. of Europe, 129.
  15. ^ Georges De Schutter, "Dutch", The Germanic Languages, eds. Ekkehard König and Johan van der Auwera (London: Routledge, 1994), 439.
  16. ^ (Dutch) See J. Verdam, Middelnederlandsch handwoordenboek (The Hague 1932 (reprinted 1994)): "Nederlant, znw. o. I) Laag of aan zee gelegen land. 2) land aan den Nederrijn; Nedersaksen, -duitschland."
  17. ^ (Dutch) Source on the Low Countries. (De Nederlanden)
  18. ^ (Dutch) neder- corresponds with the English nether-, which means "low" or "down". See Online etymological dictionary. Entry: Nether.
  19. ^ Friedrich Maurer uses the term Istvaeonic instead of Franconian; see Friedrich Maurer (1942), Nordgermanen und Alemannen: Studien zur germanischen und frühdeutschen Sprachgeschichte, Stammes- und Volkskunde, Bern: Verlag Francke.
  20. ^ Aitken, A. J. and McArthur, T. Eds. (1979) Languages of Scotland. Edinburgh,Chambers. p. 87
  21. ^ McClure (1991) in The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. 5. p. 23.
  22. ^ Robinson M. (ed.) (1985) the "Concise Scots Dictionary, Chambers, Edinburgh. p. xiii
  23. ^ Dareau M., Pike l. and Watson, H (eds) (2002) "A Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue" Vol. XII, Oxford University Press. p. xxxiv
  24. ^ Constitutive Treaty of the Union of South American Nations, Ministério das Relações Exteriores, Brazil
  25. ^ a b c Hoe trots zijn wij op het Nederlands?, Nederlandse Taalunie, 2005
  26. ^ Footnote: Native speakers of Dutch living in Wallonia and of French in Flanders are relatively small minorities that furthermore largely balance one another, hence counting all inhabitants of each unilingual area to the area's language can cause only insignificant inaccuracies (99% can speak the language). Dutch: Flanders' 6.079 million inhabitants and about 15% of Brussels' 1.019 million are 6.23 million or 59.3% of the 10.511 million inhabitants of Belgium (2006); German: 70,400 in the German-speaking community (which has language facilities for its less than 5% French-speakers), and an estimated 20,000–25,000 speakers of German in the Walloon Region outside the geographical boundaries of their official community, or 0.9%; French: in the latter area as well as mainly in the rest of Wallonia (3.414 − 0.093 = 3.321 million) and 85% of the Brussels inhabitants (0.866 million) thus 4.187 million or 39.8%; together indeed 100%.
  27. ^ a b (Dutch) "Taalgebruik in Brussel en de plaats van het Nederlands. Enkele recente bevindingen", Rudi Janssens, Brussels Studies, Nummer 13, 7 January 2008 (see page 4).
  28. ^ "Wallonie – Bruxelles, Le Service de la langue française" (in French). 1997-05-19. 
  29. ^ "Villes, identités et médias francophones: regards croisés Belgique, Suisse, Canada" (in French).  
  30. ^ G. Geerts. "Nederlands in België, Het Nederlands bedreigd en overlevend". Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taal (in Dutch). M.C. van den Toorn, W. Pijnenburg, J.A. van Leuvensteijn and J.M. van der Horst. 
  31. ^ (Dutch) "Thuis in gescheiden werelden" — De migratoire en sociale aspecten van verfransing te Brussel in het midden van de 19e eeuw", BTNG-RBHC, XXI, 1990, 3–4, pp. 383–412, Machteld de Metsenaere, Eerst aanwezend assistent en docent Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  32. ^ J. Fleerackers, Chief of staff of the Belgian Minister for Dutch culture and Flemish affairs (1973). "De historische kracht van de Vlaamse beweging in België: de doelstellingen van gister, de verwezenlijkingen vandaag en de culturele aspiraties voor morgen". Digitale bibliotheek voor Nederlandse Letteren (in Dutch). 
  33. ^ "Brussels".  
  34. ^ "Bruxelles dans l'oeil du cyclone" (in French).  
  35. ^ a b Flemish in France. The Euromosaic study by the European Commission.
  36. ^ a b c d e f Dutch/Flemish in the north of France, by Hugo Ryckeboer. University of Ghent. PDF
  37. ^ SarDesai (1997), p.88.
  38. ^ Baker (1998), p.202.
  39. ^ Ammon (2005), p.2017.
  40. ^ Booij (1995), p.2
  41. ^ a b (Dutch) Indonesië, Nederlandse Taalunie, 2008
  42. ^ a b c d (Dutch) Hoeveel studenten studeren er jaarlijks Nederlands aan universiteiten buiten het taalgebied?, Nederlandse Taalunie, 2008
  43. ^ Joel Corneal Kuipers (1998). Language, identity, and marginality in Indonesia: the changing nature of ritual speech on the Island of Sumba. Cambridge University Press. p. 9. Retrieved 2010-06-29. 
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h i (Dutch) Westerse koloniale taalpolitiek in Azië, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 1998
  45. ^ Sneddon (2003), p.162.
  46. ^ a b A Hidden Language – Dutch in Indonesia, Hendrik M, Maier, University of California
  47. ^ "Indonesia: Fight over the Papuans". Time. December 29, 1961.
  48. ^ Language Spoken at Home by sex for Australia (Excel spreadsheet), Australian 2006 census.
  49. ^ "2006 Census Data - QuickStats About Culture and Identity - Tables".  
  50. ^ (Dutch) Toelichting bij de overeenkomsttekst, Nederlandse Taalunie
  51. ^ "CIA – The World Factbook – Suriname". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  52. ^ Source: Zevende algemene volks- en woningtelling 2004, Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek
  53. ^ (Dutch) Nederlandse Taalunie
  54. ^ "Ethnologue on Sranan". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  55. ^ Recognition of Surinamese-Dutch (Surinaams-Nederlands) as an equal natiolect was expressed in 1976 by the publication of the Woordenboek van het Surinaams-Nederlands – een geannoteerde lijst van Surinaams-Nederlandse woorden en uitdrukkingen (Dictionary of Surinam Dutch – an annotated list of Surinam-Dutch words and expressions), see Johannes van Donselaar Woordenboek van het Surinaams-Nederlands – een geannoteerde lijst van Surinaams-Nederlandse woorden en uitdrukkingen, Utrecht : Instituut A. W. de Groot voor Algemene Taalwetenschap van de Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht (1976), Amsterdam, E.T.Rap (1977) ISBN 90-6005-125-4, published in 1989 as the Woordenboek van het Surinaams-Nederlands (Dictionary of Surinam Dutch), by Van Donselaar, and later by the publication of the Woordenboek Surinaams Nederlands (Dictionary Surinam Dutch) in 2009 (editor Renata de Bies, in cooperation with lexicologists Willy Martin en Willy Smedts), which was previously published as the Woordenboek van de Surinaamse Bijdrage aan het Nederlands (Dictionary of the Surinam Contribution to Dutch").
  56. ^ "CIA – The World Factbook – Aruba". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  57. ^ Languages of Aruba
  58. ^ "Jersey Dutch". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  59. ^ "German Myth 7 - Pennsylvania Dutch or German?". 2012-04-10. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  60. ^ US Census 2000 Frisian, Afrikaans, and Pennsylvania Dutch exluded.
  61. ^ "Statistics Canada 2006 (Dutch and Flemish grouped together)". 2011-07-04. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  62. ^ "Agriculture-population linkage data for the 2006 Census. The Daily". 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  63. ^ Statistics Canada, 2006 Census Profile of Federal Electoral Districts (2003 Representation Order): Language, Mobility and Migration and Immigration and Citizenship. Ottawa, 2007, pp. 6–10.
  64. ^ a b c d e (Dutch) Vlamingen en Afrikanen — Vlamingen in Centraal Afrika, Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  65. ^ (French) La langue de la Justice et les Constitutions africaines, by Nazam Halaoui. Editions juridiques associées n°51–52 2002/2-3. Cairn 2007
  66. ^ a b c (French) République démocratique du Congo, Laval University, Canada
  67. ^ (French) La situation linguistique, les langues en contact et le français dans les anciennes colonies belges en Afrique (Burundi, Rwanda, RD Congo). Réseau de chercheurs — Sociolinguistique et dynamique des langues. Agence universitaire de la Francophonie.
  68. ^ (Dutch) Congo made in Flanders? Koloniale Vlaamse visies op ‘blank’ en ‘zwart’ in Belgisch Congo, by B. Ceuppens. Academia Press. Ghent, 2003.
  69. ^ a b c School en cultuur: eenheid en verscheidenheid in de geschiedenis van het Belgische en Nederlandse onderwijs (page 18), by Nelleke Bakker and Marjoke Rietveld-van Wingerden. Published by Uitgeverij Van Gorcum, 2006
  70. ^ a b (French) ndimurukundo.pdf Problématique de la législation linguistique au Burundi, Université du Burundi
  71. ^ a b c Language Standardization and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Ana Deumert (John Benjamins Publishing Company). 2004. Retrieved 2008-11-10. 
  72. ^ a b Standaard Afrikaans. Abel Coetzee (Afrikaner Pers). 1948. Retrieved 2014-09-17. 
  73. ^ Die verhaalskat van Ons Klyntji. Abel Coetzee (Voortrekkerpers). 1940. 
  74. ^ South Africa: Legislation: 1910–2008,
  75. ^ Transformation in the Judiciary — A constitutional imperative. Supreme Court of Appeal, Government of South Africa.
  76. ^ Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics (page 214). Rajend Mesthrie (New Africa Books). 1995. Retrieved 2008-11-03. 
  77. ^ The Dutch Language: A Survey (page 132). Pierre Brachin, Paul Vincent (Brill Archive). 1985. Retrieved 2008-11-03. 
  78. ^ "Oxford Journal on Mutual Comprehensibility of Written Afrikaans and Dutch". 2006-08-27. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  79. ^ Name (Required): (2012-08-14). "Retrieved 12 April 2010". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  80. ^ a b Key results of the 2011 census, Statistics South Africa
  81. ^ Primary tables: 1996 and 2001 compared, Statistics South Africa
  82. ^ Language policy development in South Africa, by V.N. Webb, Centre for Research in the Politics of Language, University of Pretoria
  83. ^ "The World Factbook (CIA) — Namibia". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  84. ^ Language Attitudes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sociolinguistic Overview (page 26). Efurosibina E. Adegbija (Multilingual Matters). 1994. Retrieved 2008-11-10. 
  85. ^ Languages Spoken in Namibia, Namibian Government
  86. ^ "Ethnologue on Afrikaans". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  87. ^ "Taal in Nederland .:. Brabants". Retrieved 2014-06-11. 
  88. ^ Verhoeven (2005:245)
  89. ^ Stroop, Jan (October 1999). "Young Women's Farewell to Standard Dutch". Poldernederlands. Retrieved 2 January 2010. 
  90. ^ "History of the Dutch Language: Language change in the 19th and 20th century". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  91. ^ "Verb Movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact". 1995-01-20. Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  92. ^ SOS! – In het Nederlands moeten samengestelde woorden gewoon aan elkaar geschreven worden (Dutch)
  93. ^ Engelse ziekte – Dutch language WorldHeritage (Dutch)
  94. ^ Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal, "Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal is a Dutch dictionary containing over 268,826 headwords"
  95. ^ "Welkom bij de GTB van het INL". Retrieved 2012-08-19. 
  96. ^ (Dutch)
  97. ^ "". Retrieved 2013-10-17. 
  98. ^ a b (Dutch) Nederlands studeren wereldwijd, Nederlandse Taalunie, 2005
  99. ^ (Dutch) Het Nederlands op Surinaamse scholen. Short documentary on Dutch in Surinamese schools by the Nederlandse Taalunie
  100. ^ Indonesia: old tiesDutch worldwide: , Nederlandse Taalunie, 2008
  101. ^ Waar ben je nou? Nederlands leren in Indonesië. Short documentary on Dutch in Indonesia by the Nederlandse Taalunie
  102. ^ (Dutch) Neerlandistiek Wereldwijd, Nederlandse Taalunie, 2007
  103. ^
  104. ^


  • Abraham, Werner (2006), Kulikov, L.I.; Malchukov, A.L.; De Swart, Peter, eds., "Case, valency and transitivity", Studies in Language (John Benjamins Publishing Company) 77, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Adegbija, Efurosibina E. (1994), Language Attitudes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sociolinguistic Overview, Multilingual Matters, retrieved 2008-11-10 
  • Alant, Jaco (2004), Parlons Afrikaans (in French), Éditions L'Harmattan, retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • Ammon, Ulrich (2006), Sociolinguistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society (3), Walter de Gruyter, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Baker, Colin; Prys Jones, Sylvia (1997), Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual education, Multilingual Matters Ltd., retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Berdichevsky, Norman (2004), Nations, language, and citizenship, Norman Berdichevsky, retrieved 2010-05-31 
  • Batibo, Herman (2005), Language decline and death in Africa: causes, consequences, and challenges, Multilingual Matters Ltd, retrieved 2010-05-24 
  • Booij, Geert (1995), "The Phonology of Dutch.", Oxford Linguistics ( 
  • Booij, Geert (2003), "Constructional idioms and periphrasis: the progressive construction in Dutch.", Paradigms and Periphrasis ( 
  • Brachin, Pierre; Vincent, Paul (1985), The Dutch Language: A Survey, Brill Archive, retrieved 2008-11-03 
  • Bromber, Katrin; Smieja, Birgit (2004), "Globalisation and African languages: risks and benefits", Trends in Linguistics ( 
  • Brook Napier, Diane (2007), Schuster, Katherine; Witkosky, David, eds., "Language of the land: policy, politics, identity", Studies in the history of education (Information Age Publishing), retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Bussmann, Hadumod (2002), Gender across languages, John Benjamins Publishing Company, retrieved 2011-04-07 
  • Classe, Olive (2000), "Encyclopedia of Literary Translation into English", Second Edition (Fitzroy Dearborn), retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Clyne, Michael G. (2003), Dynamics of language contact: English and immigrant languages, Cambridge University Press, retrieved 2011-04-07 
  • Crisma, Paola; Longobarde, Giuseppe (2009), "Historical syntax and linguistic theory", Oxford linguistics ( 
  • Czepluch, Hartmut; Abraham, Werner (2004), Focus on Germanic typology, Akademie Verlag, retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Conradie, C. Jac (2005), """The final stages of deflection – The case of Afrikaans "het, Historical Linguistics 2005 ( 
  • De Bot, Kees; Lowie, Wander; Verspoor, Marjolyn (2005), Second language acquisition, Routledge, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Denning, Keith; Kessler, Brett; Leben, William R. (2007), English vocabulary elements, Oxford University Press US, retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Deprez, Kas (1997), Clyne, Michael G., ed., "Diets, Nederlands, Nederduits, Hollands, Vlaams, Belgisch Nederlands", Undoing and redoing corpus planning ( 
  • Deumert, Ana (2002), "Standardization and social networks – The emergence and diffusion of standard Afrikaans", Standardization – Studies from the Germanic languages ( 
  • Deumert, Ana; Vandenbussche, Wim (2003), "Germanic standardizations: past to present", Trends in Linguistics ( 
  • Deumert, Ana (2004), Language Standardization and Language Change: The Dynamics of Cape Dutch,  
  • de Swaan, Abram (2001), Words of the world: the global language system, A. de Swaan, retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • De Vogelaer, Gunther (2009), Tsiplakou, Stavroula; Karyolemou, Marilena; Pavlou, Pavlos Y., eds., "Language variation—European perspectives II", International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (John Benjamins Publishing Company), retrieved 2011-05-09 
  • Domínguez, Francesc; López, Núria (1995), Sociolinguistic and language planning organizations,  
  • Donaldson, Bruce C. (1993), A grammar of Afrikaans,  
  • Egil Breivik, Leiv; Håkon Jahr, Ernst (1987), Language change: contributions to the study of its causes,  
  • Erdentuğ, Aygen; Colombijn, Freek (2002), Urban ethnic encounters: the spatial consequences, Routledge, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • European Commission (2010), "Flemish in France", Research Centre of Multilingualism (Euromosaic), retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Fitzpatrick, Eileen (2007), "Corpus linguistics beyond the word: corpus research from phrase to discourse, Volume 2004", Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics (Rodopi) 60, retrieved 2010-11-09 
  • Geerts, G.; Clyne, Michael G. (1992), Pluricentric languages: differing norms in different nations,  
  • Gooskens, Charlotte (2007), "The Contribution of Linguistic Factors to the Intelligibility of Closely Related Languages", Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Volume 28, Issue 6 November 2007 ( 
  • Heeringa, Wilbert; de Wet, Febe (2007), The origin of Afrikaans pronunciation: a comparison to west Germanic languages and Dutch dialects,  
  • Herriman, Michael L.; Burnaby, Barbara (1996), Language policies in English-dominant countries: six case studies, Multilingual Matters Ltd., retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Hiskens, Frans; Auer, Peter; Kerswill, Paul (2005), The study of dialect convergence and divergence: conceptual and methodological considerations.,  
  • Hogg, Richard M. (2002), An introduction to Old English,  
  • Holm, John A. (1989), Pidgins and Creoles: References survey,  
  • Ingram, David (1989), First language acquisition: method, description, and explanation,  
  • Jansen, Carel; Schreuder, Robert; Neijt, Anneke (2007), "The influence of spelling conventions on perceived plurality in compounds. A comparison of Afrikaans and Dutch.", Written Language & Literacy 10:2 ( 
  • Jones, Russell (2008), "Loan-words in Indonesian and Malay", Indonesian Etymological Project, KITLV Office Jakarta (Yayasan Obor Indonesia), retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Jordens, Peter; Lalleman, Josine A. (1988), "Language development", 5 (Walter de Gruyter), retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Kager, René (1989), "A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch", Linguistic models (Walter de Gruyter) 14, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. (2004), "The language planning situation in South Africa", in Baldauf, Richard B.; Kaplan, Robert B., Language planning and policy in Africa, Multilingual Matters Ltd., retrieved 2010-05-31 
  • Kennedy Wyld, Henry Cecil (2009), The Growth of English: An Elementary Account of the Present Form of Our Language, and Its Development, BiblioBazaar, LLC, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Langer, Nils; Davies, Winifred V. (2005), Linguistic purism in the Germanic languages,  
  • Lass, Roger (1994), Old English: a historical linguistic companion, Cambridge University Press, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Lightfoot, David (1999), "The development of language: acquisition, change, and evolution", Blackwell/Maryland lectures in language and cognition (Wiley-Blackwell) 1, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Machan, Tim William (2009), Language anxiety: conflict and change in the history of English,  
  • Maier, H.M.J. (2005), A Hidden Language – Dutch in Indonesia, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley, retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • Mallory, J.P.; Adams, Douglas Q. (2006), The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world,  
  • Maurer, Friedrich (1942), Nordgermanen und Alemannen: Studien zur germanischen und frühdeutschen Sprachgeschichte, Stammes- und Volkskunde, Strasbourg: Hünenburg.
  • McGoldrick, Monica; Giordano, Joseph; Garcia-Preto, Nydia (2005), Ethnicity and family therapy,  
  • McLean, Daryl; McCormick, Kay (1996), "English in South Africa 1940–1996", in Fishman, Joshua A.; Conrad, Andrew W.; Rubal-Lopez, Alma, Post-imperial English: status change in former British and American colonies, 1940–1990,  
  • Mennen, Ineke; Levelt, Clara; Gerrits, Ellen (2006), "Acquisition of Dutch phonology: an overview.", Speech Science Research Centre Working Paper WP10 ( 
  • Mesthrie, Rajend (1995), Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics, New Africa Books, retrieved 2008-08-23 
  • Mesthrie, Rajend (2002), Language in South Africa,  
  • Müller, Gereon (1995), A-bar syntax: a study in movement types, Walter de Gruyter, retrieved 2011-04-07 
  • Myers-Scotton, Carol (2006), Multiple voices: an introduction to bilingualism, Blackwell Publishing, retrieved 2010-05-31 
  • Niesler, Thomas; Louw, Philippa; Roux, Justus (2005), "Phonetic analysis of Afrikaans, English, Xhosa and Zulu using South African speech databases", Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 23 (4): 459–474 
  • Onysko, Alexander; Michel, Sascha (2010), Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, Walter de Gruyter, retrieved 2011-04-07 
  • Palmer, Vernon Valentine (2001), Mixed jurisdictions worldwide: the third legal family, Vernon V. Palmer, retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • Page, Melvin Eugene; Sonnenburg, Penny M. (2003), Colonialism: an international, social, cultural, and political encyclopedia, Melvin E. Page, retrieved 2010-05-19 
  • Proost, Kristel (2006), Proost, Kristel; Winkler, Edeltraud, eds., "Von Intentionalität zur Bedeutung konventionalisierter Zeichen", Studien zur Deutschen Sprache (in German) (Gunter Narr Verlag), retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • Putnam, Michael T. (2011), [tp:// Studies on German-language Islands], John Benjamins Publishing Company, retrieved 2011-04-07 
  • Réguer, Laurent Philippe (2004), Si loin, si proche...: Une langue européenne à découvrir : le néerlandais (in French),  
  • Sebba, Mark (1997), Contact languages: pidgins and creoles,  
  • Sebba, Mark (2007), Spelling and society: the culture and politics of orthography around the world,  
  • Shetter, William Z.; Ham, Esther (2007), Dutch: an essential grammar, Taylor & Francis, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Simpson, Andrew (2008), Language and national identity in Africa,  
  • Simpson, J.M.Y. (2009), "Dutch", in Brown, Keith; Ogilvie, Sarah, Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world, Elsevier, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Sneddon, James N. (2003), The Indonesian language: its history and role in modern society, UNSW Press, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Sonnenschein, E.A. (2008), A New English Grammar Based on the Recommendations of the Joint Committee on Grammatical Terminology, Read Books, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Stell, Gerard (2008–11), Mapping linguistic communication across colour divides: Black Afrikaans in Central South Africa,  
  • Swan, Michael; Smith, Bernard (2001), Learner English: a teacher's guide to interference and other problems, Volume 1,  
  • Thomson, William R. (2003), "Indonesia", in Page, Kogan, Asia & Pacific Review 2003/04: The Economic and Business Report, Kogan Page Publishers, pp. 76–85, retrieved 2010-06-03 
  • Todd, Loreto (2004), Pidgins and Creoles, Routledge, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Vos, Mei Li (2001), International cooperation between politics and practice: how Dutch Indonesian cooperation changed remarkably little after a diplomatic rupture, Het Spinhuis, retrieved 2010-06-29 
  • Webb, Victor N. (2002), "Language in South Africa: the role of language in national transformation, reconstruction and development", Impact Studies in Language and Society ( 
  • Webb, Victor N. (2003), "Language policy development in South Africa", Centre for Research in the Politics of Language ( 
  • Weissenborn, Jürgen; Höhle, Barbara (2001), "Approaches to bootstrapping", Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (John Benjamins Publishing Company) 1, retrieved 2010-11-06 
  • Willemyns, Roland (2013), Dutch: Biography of a language, Oxford UP,  
  • Namibian Population Census (2001), Languages Spoken in Namibia, Government of Namibia, retrieved 2010-05-28 
  • CIA (2010), The World Factbook (CIA) — Namibia,  

External links

  • The Nederlandse Taalunie, Dutch language union
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.