World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Socialist Party of Romania

Article Id: WHEBN0010152712
Reproduction Date:

Title: Socialist Party of Romania  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Romanian Communist Party, Socialist Party of Transylvania, Ecaterina Arbore, Vitali Holostenco, Ghiță Moscu
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Socialist Party of Romania

The Socialist Party of Romania (Romanian: Partidul Socialist din România, commonly known as Partidul Socialist, PS) was a Romanian socialist political party, created on December 11, 1918 by members of the Social Democratic Party of Romania (PSDR), after the latter emerged from clandestinity. Through its PSDR legacy, the PS maintained a close connection with the local labor movement and was symbolically linked to the first local socialist group, the Romanian Social-Democratic Workers' Party. Its creation coincided with the establishment of Greater Romania in the wake of World War I; after May 1919, it began a process of fusion with the social democratic groups of ethnic Romanians in Austria-Hungary — the Social Democratic Party of Transylvania and Banat and the Romanian Social Democratic Party of Bukovina. The three groups adopted a common platform in October 1920. Progressively influenced by Leninism, the PS became divided between a maximalist majority supporting Bolshevik guidelines and a reformist-minded minority: the former affiliated with the Comintern as the Socialist-Communist Party in May 1921 (officially known as Communist Party of Romania from 1922), while the minority eventually established a new Romanian Social Democratic Party.

The PS had its headquarters in Bucharest, at the Socialist Club on Sfântul Ionică Street No.12, near the old National Theater (located just north of University Square, the street is currently a section of Ion Câmpineanu Street, after the latter was rerouted).[1] The building eventually also housed all Romanian trade unions of the period, as well as the General Trade Unions' Commission.[2] The Socialists edited the newspaper Socialismul, headquartered on Academiei Street.[3]



In 1915, at a time when Romania hept its neutrality, the PSDR, led by the revolutionary-minded Alecu Constantinescu, and others remained active in Bucharest under occupation by the Central Powers, and maintained links with the Social Democratic Party of Germany;[5] the group, also including Ecaterina Arbore, Constantin Popovici, Ilie Moscovici (known under the pseudonym of Ilie Bădulescu, brother of communist politico Gelber Moscovici), and Constantin Titel Petrescu, protested the peace with the Central powers and was arrested by the Alexandru Marghiloman government, but released through an amnesty soon after.[8]

The PSDR's history was decisively marked by the Alexandru Nicolau and Ion Dic Dicescu's short-lived Romanian Social Democratic Action Committee in planning an insurgency,[9] before being driven out by a German military intervention.[10]


The PSDR itself radicalized its message, adding to its previous calls for universal suffrage a republican program and support for land reform.[11] Its program also called for an end to all forms of exploitation, but argued that this was to be fulfilled inside the existing legislative framework.[12] King Ferdinand I's promise to legislate the land reform, together with electoral reform, was embraced by PSDR's moderate wing.[5]

After the party adopted its new name, it proclaimed its commitment to dictatorship of the proletariat, and became involved in supporting the radicalized labor movement, culminating in the 1920 general strike.[13]

Seven o'clock in the evening...
It's quiet throughout the land.
(Cartoon by Nicolae Tonitza, published in Socialismul, December 1919)

On December 26 [O.S. December 13] 1918, just days after the party was founded, typesetters at various presses in Bucharest, who had been protesting since November, rallied in front of the Sfântul Ionică building and marched on the Ministry of Industry headquarters on Calea Victoriei, asking for the eight-hour day, salary increases, the guarantee of civil liberties, and more say for the trade unions.[14] The group quickly swelled in numbers, to about as many as 15,000 workers in a contemporary account.[15] On orders of the Constantin Coandă cabinet, who feared Bolshevik agitation,[16] troops were ultimately ordered to fire on the crowd and assail it with bayonets in as many as three successive waves.[17] They also stormed into the Sfântul Ionică building and arrested several Socialist leaders, including the general secretary Moscovici and I. C. Frimu[18] (Frimu later died in custody).[5] Four PS members, including Alecu Constantinescu, were each sentenced to five years in prison, while all others arrested were acquitted.[16] Eventually, in February 1919, most demands of the Socialist group were fulfilled after the Transylvanian Socialists Iosif Jumanca and Ioan Flueraş, urged by Constantin Titel Petrescu, came to Bucharest and discussed the matter with both King Ferdinand and the new Premier, Ion I. C. Brătianu.[16]

In May 1919, delegates of the Transylvanian and Bukovinan groups began negotiations with the PS to form a single political movement, and elected representatives to the newly created General Council of the Socialist Party.[19] A single statute was adopted in October 1920.[20]

In late 1919, the main Socialist Party and the Transylvanian wing were approached by the emerging People's Party for a fusion; the matter was discussed between, on the Socialist side, Moscovici, Flueraş, and Jumanca, and, from among the People's Party, by Alexandru Averescu and Constantin Argetoianu.[21] Talks yielded no results, especially after Averescu attempted to impose his party's platform on the Socialists.[22] During negotiations, Argetoianu observed that unease was growing between Moscovici's group and the party's far left, rallied around Cristescu.[22]

After the [26] (50 party members were still held in prisons by early 1921).[27]

In early 1921, the PS had 27 branches nation-wide,[3] totaling 40,000 to 45,000 registered members[28] and rallying support from most workers affiliated with trade unions (more than 200,000 people).[29] Estimates place the industrial working class of the 1920s and 1930s at between 400,000 and 820,000 people.[30]

Notable PS activists at the time were David Fabian, Elena Filipescu, and Panait Muşoiu.[31] Among the PS' sympathizers were the artist and former prisoner of war Nicolae Tonitza, who regularly contributed graphics to Socialismul,[32] and the writer Gala Galaction.[32]

Comintern and reformist split

The major issue splitting the party involved affiliation to the Comintern, seen by many PS members as a successor to the Second International. In 1920 the party sent representatives to the 2nd World Congress of the Comintern in Moscow, were they engaged in prolonged talks over the issue of affiliation with Christian Rakovsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Nikolai Bukharin.[33] These were Cristescu, Dobrogeanu-Gherea, David Fabian, and Constantin Popovici; the two delegates representing the Socialist Party of Transylvania and Banat were Eugen Rozvan and Flueraş — as a former member of the National Romanian Council in Transylvania, Flueraş was deemed a "class enemy" by the Comintern.[34]

Specifically, Bukharin called on the PS to accept the policy changes theorized by Vladimir Lenin (the so-called 21 points), to exclude Flueraş and others, to submit itself to supervision from the Comintern's Balkan Communist Federation, to vote in a new Central Committee, and to guarantee that Socialismul would be turned into a communist newspaper.[35] An additional and hotly contested demand involved submitting trade unions to party control.[36]

Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Popovici, and Cristescu met with Lenin,[37] who urged them to adopt the resolution in this form, while allegedly making some promises to preserve a certain degree of autonomy for the Romanian group.[38] Returned to Bucharest, Flueraş called on the party to return to a reformist stance and support for [39]

May Congress

At the same time, the maximalist wing, led by Cristescu (who renounced his reserves after first engaging in a heated polemic with Rozvan),[40] passed the resolution to join the Comintern and accept Lenin's 21 points.[41] The Cominternist motion was drafted with support from 18 out of 38 members of the General Council,[42] and submitted to the Congress which took place after May 8, with the maximalist faction adopting the name of Socialist-Communist Party (PCdR).[43]

According to sources, during the vote on May 11, advocates of the Comintern had received 428 mandates from a total of 540,[44] and, given the departure of the reformists, represented 51 out of 77 delegates.[42] Commenting on the success of Leninist delegates, researchers Adrian Cioroianu and Victor Frunză both attributed it to manipulation of inner-party electoral procedures rather than actual appeal.[45] Such supposition was however not shared by contemporaneous opponents of the affiliation: according to the deposition of reformist leader Iacob Pistiner during the Dealul Spirii Trial, had the PSR leaders failed to affiliate to the Third International, the mass of the party membership would have overridden them.[46] A third PS wing, comprising the centrists who supported conditional affiliation and provided 111 mandates,[47] was marginalized inside the Communist group over the following period.[48]

The procedures were cause for much deliberation: according to his own testimony, the reformist Şerban Voinea, who translated Lenin's 21 points, was accused of having fabricated them as a means to give the Bolsheviks bad press (a fellow delegate shouted that "It was absolutely impossible for the Third International to have voted such a text, with such conditions"),[49] while Boris Stefanov allegedly heckled him, suggesting Voinea leave the PS and join the National Liberal Party ("[he] kept shouting at me [...]: «To the Liberals! To the Liberals!»").[49] Voinea also left detail on the impact the Congress had on the outside:

"The matter had become a slogan with which people would greet each other throughout the city: «Long live the third [International]! Long live the third!». Children would say to one another: «Long live the third!». At the time, it took real civic courage to declare oneself against the IIIrd International."[49]


Romanian Army regulars headed by a Royal Commissioner stormed into the Sfântul Ionică building at 15:00 on May 12, 1921; all 51 Socialist-Communist delegates were separated from the group, arrested, and transported to the penal facilities of Jilava and Văcăreşti.[50] An additional 200 known Socialist-Communist militants were also incarcerated.[38] Among those taken into custody, aside from Cristescu and Stefanov, were Vitali Holostenco, Marcel Pauker, Elena Filipescu, Lucreţiu Pătrăşcanu, and Elek Köblös, all of whom were later prominent Communists.[51] The intervention occurred at a time when the floor was taken by Köblös, the PS delegate from Târgu Mureş, who was much later accused of conspiring with the authorities, based on speculation that his speech was in fact a signal.[52]

Authorities prosecuted those arrested (as many as 300 in one account)[53] in the Dealul Spirii Trial, and attempted to connect them with Max Goldstein, a terrorist of uncertain affiliation who had detonated a bomb inside the Romanian Senate on December 8, 1920.[54] Charges were based on the group's rejection of Greater Romania and their advocacy of "World revolution", which had raised suspicion that they were trying to overthrow the existing order through actions such as Goldstein's.[55] In technical terms, this was formulated by the prosecutors as:

"Congress overstepped [its] order of the day and submitted to debate affiliation to the Third International, deciding to vote on it."[56]

The instigator for the move was Constantin Argetoianu, Minister of the Interior in the Alexandru Averescu People's Party cabinet, who latter admitted that the arrest lacked legal grounds.[42] He also stated that he had given Cristescu approval for the Congress as a means for the arguably illegal motion to be discussed,[42] and evidenced that he had planned to arrest the leaders based on his belief that, once this was accomplished, "all agitation will crumble like an edifice raised on sand".[57] The move provoked mixed reactions inside the executive: according to Argetoianu, Premier Averescu was hesitant, while the Minister of Justice, Grigore Trancu-Iaşi, advised against it (reason why Argetoianu decided to order the arrest without prior knowledge from his fellow People's Party members, as a fait accompli).[42] Confident, Argetoianu subsequently stated that "Communism is over in Romania".[58]

As the trial was under way, Argetoianu allowed for several Socialist-Communist defendants (including Leonte Filipescu) to be shot while in custody — alleging that they had attempted to flee.[59] Several of the detainees declared they had been beaten, and some were occasionally moved to solitary confinement.[60]

At the 3rd Comintern Congress in July, Karl Radek reported that the Russian Bolshevik government and the international group at large continued to recognize the Socialist-Communist leaders in prison as the official executive body of the Romanian party.[61] Several refugees, mostly natives of Bessarabia, were elected as the party's representatives in Moscow: they included Saul Ozias and Gelber Moscovici.[61] Joining them was Alecu Constantinescu, as the only prominent socialist present.[61] Victor Frunză credited this moment with severing ties between the PS' tradition and the new Bolshevik course;[62] his view was disputed by Vladimir Tismăneanu, who concluded instead that subordination to the Comintern was equally demanded from all pro-Bolshevik PS members.[61]

Aftermath and legacy

Most of the accused were eventually [65] In 1925, Cristescu himself left the Communist group after clashing with the Balkan Communist Federation over the issue of Greater Romania and being progressively marginalized.[66] The PCdR survived as a marginal grouping in the underground, with much of its leadership taking refuge in the Soviet Union; upon the close of World War II, it was resurrected with the help of Soviet occupation, to become the ruling party of Communist Romania.

Reestablished in January 1922 and led by Ilie Moscovici, Litman Ghelerter and Constantin Popovici,[67] the PS continued to have nominal existence after it merged into the newly created Federation of Romanian Socialist Parties or FPSR (May 1922). Using PS symbolism[68] and reuniting the country's reformist groups, this established its own faction in the Chamber of Deputies, and was represented to the 2½ International.[69][70] On May 7, 1927, the various groups in the Federation merged to reestablish the Romanian Social Democratic Party (PSD), led by Constantin Titel Petrescu.[71] The Socialist Party, unlike other groups, refused to join the Second International, and affiliated instead with the Paris Bureau (it was joined in this by a group on the PSD's left wing).[70]

Claiming direct lineage and legitimacy, the Communists encouraged several myths about the Socialist Party: in 1921, Rakovsky made the claim that the PCdR had inherited the vast majority of the PS' 40,000 members[72] (such a view was virulently rejected by the FPSR, who credited the PCdR with no more than 500 members,[73] while the Comintern itself eventually reduced the official claim to 2,000 members);[73] in 1951, several years after the Communist Party came to power, its leader [74]


  1. ^ Cioroianu, p.23; Diac; Felea, p.43; Liveanu, p.37, 38
  2. ^ Felea, p.43
  3. ^ a b Cioroianu, p.23
  4. ^ a b 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Tănase, "Cristian Racovski"; Tismăneanu, p.66-67
  5. ^ a b c d 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15
  6. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Tănase, "Cristian Racovski"
  7. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Tănase, "Cristian Racovski"
  8. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Brătescu
  9. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Tănase, "Cristian Racovski"
  10. ^ Tănase, "Cristian Racovski"
  11. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15, 18-19; Frunză, p.36
  12. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.18
  13. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.18; Argetoianu, "Memorii (Magazin Istoric), p.75; Cioroianu, p.23; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"
  14. ^ Brătescu; Liveanu, p.37-40
  15. ^ General Mărgineanu, rendered in Liveanu, p.41
  16. ^ a b c Brătescu
  17. ^ Felea, p.43-45; Liveanu, p.40-41
  18. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.15; Felea, p.45-46; Liveanu, p.41
  19. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.16-17, 18
  20. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.18
  21. ^ Argetoianu, "Memorii (Magazin Istoric), p.74-75
  22. ^ a b Argetoianu, "Memorii (Magazin Istoric), p.75
  23. ^ Radu, p.575, 579
  24. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.18; Ţiu
  25. ^ Ţiu
  26. ^ Cioroianu, p.23; Frunză, p.21, 23-24; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"
  27. ^ Frunză, p.24
  28. ^ Cioroianu, p.27; Frunză, p.28-29, 30
  29. ^ Cioroianu, p.27
  30. ^ Tismăneanu, p.63
  31. ^ Felea, p.46-47
  32. ^ a b Zambaccian
  33. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.17, 19; Frunză, p.21-26; Tismăneanu, p.68-69
  34. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.17; Frunză, p.21-27; Tismăneanu, p.68-69
  35. ^ Tismăneanu, p.69-70. Similar demands rendered in Frunză, p.22-26
  36. ^ Frunză, p.25-26
  37. ^ Frunză, p.22, 24; Tismăneanu, p.71
  38. ^ a b Tismăneanu, p.71
  39. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.17, 19; Cioroianu, p.24; Frunză, p.31-32; Diac
  40. ^ Cioroianu, p.24
  41. ^ Cioroianu, p.21, 23-29; Diac; Tismăneanu, p.71
  42. ^ a b c d e Diac
  43. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.19; Cioroianu, p.21, 23-29; Frunză, p.26-29
  44. ^ Cioroianu, p.27; Diac; Tismăneanu, p.71
  45. ^ Cioroianu, p.27; Frunză, p.21, 27
  46. ^ M. C. Stănescu, Mișcarea muncitorească din România în anii 1921-1924, Editura Politică, București, 1974, p. 116
  47. ^ Cioroianu, p.27; Diac; Frunză, p.26; Tismăneanu, p.71
  48. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.19
  49. ^ a b c Voinea, in Diac
  50. ^ Cioroianu, p.25-26; Diac; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"; Tismăneanu, p.71
  51. ^ Tismăneanu, p.71, 72
  52. ^ Cioroianu, p.25
  53. ^ Frunză, p.29
  54. ^ Cioroianu, p.14, 29; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"; Tismăneanu, p.72. According to Tănase ("Procesul din Dealul Spirei"), despite Cristescu's dissociation the Socialist-Communists from Goldstein, the latter was actually a PS member who could not attend the Congress
  55. ^ Cioroianu, p.29; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"; Tismăneanu, p.71, 72
  56. ^ Rendered in Diac
  57. ^ Argetoianu, in Diac
  58. ^ Argetoianu, in Diac; in Troncotă, p.19
  59. ^ Troncotă, p.18-19
  60. ^ Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"
  61. ^ a b c d Tismăneanu, p.72
  62. ^ Frunză, p.32-33, 40-41, 48-50; Tismăneanu, p.72
  63. ^ Cioroianu, p.29; Tismăneanu, p.73; Troncotă, p.19
  64. ^ Cioroianu, p.30; Tănase, "Procesul din Dealul Spirei"; Tismăneanu, p.73-74
  65. ^ Frunză, p.32-33; Tismăneanu, p.78-79
  66. ^ Cioroianu, Pe umerii..., p.38-39; Frunză, p.49-50; Tismăneanu, p.79
  67. ^ Cioroianu, p.31; Frunză, p.30-31; Tismăneanu, p.79
  68. ^ Radu, p.575, 577
  69. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.19; Cioroianu, p.30-31
  70. ^ a b How the Bolshevik-Leninist Group of Romania was Founded (with introduction), at the Marxists Internet Archive; retrieved July 19, 2007
  71. ^ 110 ani de social-democraţie, p.20; Tismăneanu, p.79
  72. ^ Rendered in Frunză, p.28-29
  73. ^ a b Rendered in Frunză, p.30
  74. ^ Cioroianu, p.27-28


  • (Romanian) ("110 Years of Social Democracy in Romania")110 ani de social-democraţie în România, Social Democratic Party, Ovidiu Şincai Social Democratic Institute, Bucharest, July 9, 2003; retrieved July 19, 2007
  • Constantin Argetoianu, "Memorii" ("Memoirs"; fragment), in Magazin Istoric, March 1968
  • (Romanian) Gheorghe Brătescu, Constantin Titel Petrescu, at the Social Democratic Party-Constantin Titel Petrescu site; retrieved July 19, 2007
  • Adrian Cioroianu, Pe umerii lui Marx. O introducere în istoria comunismului românesc ("On the Shoulders of Marx. An Incursion into the History of Romanian Communism"), Editura Curtea Veche, Bucharest, 2005
  • (Romanian) Cristina Diac, "La «kilometrul 0» al comunismului românesc. «S-a terminat definitiv cu comunismul in România!»" ("At «Kilometer 0» in Romanian Communism. «Communism in Romania Is Definitely Over!»"), in Jurnalul Naţional, October 6, 2004; retrieved July 19, 2007
  • I. Felea, "O citadelă socialistă: sediul din Sf. Ionică" ("A Socialist Citadel: the Sfântul Ionică Headquarters"), in Magazin Istoric, November 1968
  • Victor Frunză, Istoria stalinismului în România ("The History of Stalinism in Romania"), Humanitas, Bucharest, 1990
  • V. Liveanu, "13 Decembrie 1918. De câte ori au fost atacaţi muncitorii" ("13 December 1918. The Number of Times Workers Were Attacked"), in Magazin Istoric, November 1968
  • (Romanian) Sorin Radu, "Semnele electorale ale partidelor politice în perioada interbelică", in the National Museum of the Union's Apulum Yearbook, Vol. XXXIX, 2002, p.573-586
  • Stelian Tănase,
    • (Romanian) "Cristian Racovski" (Part I), in Magazin Istoric, April 2004; retrieved July 19, 2007
    • (Romanian) "Procesul din Dealul Spirei" ("The Dealul Spirii Trial"), in Magazin Istoric, October 2003; retrieved July 19, 2007
  • Vladimir Tismăneanu, Stalinism pentru eternitate, Polirom, Iaşi, 2005 ISBN 973-681-899-3 (translation of Stalinism for All Seasons: A Political History of Romanian Communism, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2003, ISBN 0-520-23747-1)
  • (Romanian) Ilarion Ţiu, "Aliatul lui Stalin" ("Stalin's Ally"), in Jurnalul Naţional, June 7, 2005; retrieved July 19, 2007
  • Cristian Troncotă, "Siguranţa şi spectrul revoluţiei comuniste" ("Siguranţa and the Spectre of Communist Revolution"), in Dosarele Istoriei, 4(44)/2000
  • (Romanian) Krikor Zambaccian, "Chapter XII: Tonitza", in ("The Recordings of an Art Aficionado")Însemnările unui amator de artă, published and hosted by LiterNet; retrieved July 19, 2007
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.