World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Rwandan Genocide denial

Article Id: WHEBN0029198407
Reproduction Date:

Title: Rwandan Genocide denial  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Nanking Massacre denial, Denial of the Holodomor, Holocaust denial, Genocide denial, Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime
Collection: Denialism, Genocide Denial, Pseudohistory, Rwandan Genocide
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Rwandan Genocide denial

Rwandan Genocide denial is the assertion that the Rwandan Genocide did not occur in the manner or to the extent described by scholarship. The Rwandan Genocide is widely acknowledged by genocide scholars to have been one of the biggest modern genocides, as many sources point to the sheer scale of the death toll as evidence for a systematic, organized plan to eliminate the victims.

Denial of the Rwandan Genocide is a crime in Rwanda.[1]

Contents

  • Denial by officials 1
  • Herman and Peterson 2
  • Rwanda, The Untold Story 3
  • References 4

Denial by officials

A high-ranking Tutsi and a UN official have claimed that no genocide of the Tutsi took place at all: Antoine Nyetera, who claims Tutsi royal origins, and the former UN Representative in Rwanda, Roger Booboh, who declared that "to claim that a genocide occurred is closer to the politics of surrealism than to the truth".[2]

Herman and Peterson

In The Politics of Genocide (2010), economist Edward S. Herman and independent researcher David Peterson, while not denying the scale of the killing during the period of extreme violence of April–July 1994, questioned the distribution of the victims for those months, arguing that Hutus comprised the majority of the dead, not Tutsis.[3] Their detractors have charged them with genocide denial,[4][5] accusations that have been condemned by Herman and Peterson.[6][7]

Their book goes much further than others who have questioned the consensus view of the genocide: it states that common knowledge is not simply partly incorrect, but is actually "a propaganda line ... that turned perpetrator and victim upside-down."[8] The pair are critical of fundamental aspects of the well-known report by Alison Des Forges,[9] and maintain that she obfuscates the issue of who assassinated Habyarimana (they argue it was clearly the RPF) and that, contrary to the conclusions of Des Forges's report, the only well-planned regimen of massive violence perpetrated after the assassination was the RPF's invasion to drive the Hutu from power.[10] With this arguments in mind, Herman and Peterson conclude that the RPF were "prime génocidaires", while the Interahamwe were "the RPF's actual victims."[11]

Their book argues that the accepted version of the events of 1994 implies Rwanda is "the first case in history in which a minority population, suffering destruction at the hands of its tormentors, drove its tormentors from power and assumed control of a country, all in the span of less than one hundred days", a narrative Herman and Peterson deem "incredible in the extreme."[12]

Africa specialist Gerald Caplan criticized Herman and Peterson's account, noting "why the Hutu members of the government 'couldn't possibly have planned a genocide against the Tutsi' is never remotely explained".[13] Herman and Peterson's position on the genocide was found "deplorable" by James Wizeye, first secretary at the Rwandan High Commission in London.[14] Adam Jones has compared Herman and Peterson's approach to Holocaust denial.[15]

According to sociologist Martin Shaw, Noam Chomsky subscribes to the Herman–Peterson thesis.[16]

Rwanda, The Untold Story

In 2014, the BBC aired the documentary Rwanda, The Untold Story, which included interviews with American researchers who claim that most of the victims may have been Hutus. Afterwards, Rwanda's parliament approved a resolution to ban the BBC in the country.[17]

References

  1. ^ Holland, Hereward (17 June 2010). "Rwanda frees U.S. lawyer due to health, charges remain".  
  2. ^ Lemarchand 2013, p. 10.
  3. ^ Herman & Peterson 2010, pp. 51–68.
  4. ^  
  5. ^ Martin Shaw (16 September 2010). "The politics of genocide: Rwanda & DR Congo".  
  6. ^ ZNet. Retrieved 7 August 2013.
  7. ^ mrzine.monthlyreview.org. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
  8. ^ Herman & Peterson 2010, p. 51.
  9. ^ Human Rights Watch. ISBN . http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1999/rwanda/rwanda0399.htm.
  10. ^ Herman & Peterson 2010, pp. 51–2.
  11. ^ Herman & Peterson 2010, p. 54.
  12. ^ Herman & Peterson 2010, pp. 56–7.
  13. ^ Caplan, Gerald, "The Politics of Genocide"The politics of denialism: The strange case of Rwanda - Review of , Pambazuka News, #486, 16 June 2010.
  14. ^ Wizeye, James, "To claim Tutsis caused Rwanda's genocide is pure revisionism", The Guardian, 25 July 2011.
  15. ^ "See No Evil-Amazing People are Denying Every Genocide in Sight", Genocide Protection News, #11, Fall 2012.
  16. ^ Martin Shaw. 16 September 2010. "The politics of genocide: Rwanda & DR Congo". OpenDemocracy.
  17. ^ "Rwanda MPs condemn BBC Untold Story programme on genocide". BBC.com.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.