World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Operation Harling

Article Id: WHEBN0025894852
Reproduction Date:

Title: Operation Harling  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Greek Resistance, Military history of Greece during World War II, Greek People's Liberation Army, Drakeia massacre, Mesovouno massacres
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Operation Harling

Operation Harling
Part of World War II and the Greek Resistance
Date 25 November 1942
Location Greece
Result ELAS, EDES and British victory
Belligerents
Greek People's Liberation Army National Republican Greek League
Special Operations Executive (SOE)
Royal Italian Army
Wehrmacht
Commanders and leaders
Eddie Myers
Chris Woodhouse
Aris Velouchiotis
Napoleon Zervas
Unknown
Strength
86 from ELAS and 52 from EDES
12 SOE agents
100
5
Casualties and losses
4 wounded Unknown

Operation Harling was a viaduct in Central Greece on 25 November 1942. This was one of the first major sabotage acts in Axis-occupied Europe, and the beginning of a permanent British involvement with the Greek Resistance.

Background

Operation Harling was conceived in late summer 1942 as an effort to stem the flow of supplies through Greece to the [3] The team would be under the command of Lieutenant Colonel (later brevetted to Brigadier) E. C. W. "Eddie" Myers of the Royal Engineers, "the only parachute-trained professional sapper officer in the Middle East", according to his second-in-command, Major (later brevetted to Colonel) Chris Woodhouse. After completion of the mission, the British team would be evacuated, leaving only Woodhouse, the Greek 2nd Lieutenant Themis Marinos and two radio operators to establish a liaison with the fledgling Greek Resistance movement.[2][4]

In Greece meanwhile, the first attempts at armed resistance in Greek Macedonia were quelled in the summer of 1941 by the Germans and Bulgarians. The spring and summer of 1942 however saw the birth of the first armed guerrilla units in the mountainous interior of Central Greece and Epirus. From the beginning, the largest among them was the Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS), founded by the Communist-led National Liberation Front (EAM) and headed by Aris Velouchiotis. The second largest were the forces of the National Republican Greek League (EDES), headed by Colonel Napoleon Zervas.[5][6] The Harling mission's British officers were largely ignorant of the realities on the ground in occupied Greece, or of the precise nature, let alone the strength and political affiliation of the emerging resistance groups.[5][7]

The mission

Landing in Greece, contacting the Resistance

The SOE team numbered twelve men and was divided into three groups of four, each consisting of a leader, an interpreter, a sapper and a radio operator. The first group was composed of Lt. Colonel Eddie Myers, CO of the mission and group leader, Captain Denys Hamson as interpreter, Captain Tom Barnes (a New Zealander) as the sapper and Sergeant Len Willmott as wireless operator. The second group consisted of Maj. Chris Woodhouse, 2nd Lieutenant Themis Marinos (a Greek), Lieutenant Inder Gill (of mixed Scottish and Sikh descent who later became a Lieutenant General in the Indian Army) and Sergeant Doug Phillips. The third group consisted of Major John Cooke, Captain Nat Barker, Captain Arthur Edmonds (a New Zealander) and Sergeant Mike Chittis.[8][9]

The team was distributed per group to three B-24 Liberator aircraft. A first attempt to drop them over Greece on 28 September failed, as the pre-arranged signal fires had not been lit. During the next flight on 30 September, the fires were located, and the Harling team was dropped near Mount Giona in Central Greece.[10][11] The third plane was unable to locate any fires, and Major Cooke's group jumped near the heavily garrisonned town of Karpenissi. One group member even landed inside the town itself, and was hidden by local Greeks. Evading the Italian troops searching for them, they made for the hills, where they came upon the guerrillas of Aris Velouchiotis.[12]

In the meantime, the main group was being hidden by the local Greeks and constantly moved around the area to prevent their capture by Italian searching parties, while Woodhouse set out to the town of [14] On 2 November, Woodhouse set out to establish contact with Zervas' men in the Valtos Mountains region, while on 14 November, Major Cooke's team rejoined the main party, with information that they had made contact with Aris. Woodhouse returned on the same day, with Zervas and 45 of his men.[15] From the outset, Zervas was enthusiastic for the mission, but Velouchiotis less so, for the Athens-based leadership of EAM-ELAS still did not appreciate the importance and potential of armed struggle in the countryside, preferring to focus on the cities instead. In the end, Velouchiotis, on his own initiative and contrary to the instructions received from EAM, decided to participate in the operation.[7][16]

The sabotage

The force available for the operation numbered 150 men: the twelve-strong British team, which would form the demolition party, 86 ELAS men and 52 EDES men, who would provide cover and neutralize the garrison. According to the plan, the attack was to take place on 23:00 on 25 November. Two teams of eight guerrillas were to cut the railway and telephone lines in both directions, as well as cover the approaches to the bridge itself, while the main force of 100 guerrillas was to neutralize the garrison. The demolition party, divided into three teams, would wait upriver until the garrison had been subdued, and then lay the charges.[17]

The attack on the garrison outposts on the two ends of the bridge began as scheduled, but went on far longer than the time originally allotted. Myers took it upon himself to send the demolition teams in while the fight was still under way.[18] The setting of the charges was delayed also, since the girders to be destroyed turned out to be differently shaped than had been anticipated, forcing the British sappers to cut their plastic explosive charges to pieces and then assemble new ones.[19] After the charges were set and the fuses were lit, the first explosion occurred on 01:30, heavily damaging the central pier and collapsing two spans. The British demolition teams then set new explosives to the second pier and the remaining span, which too went off on 02:21. In the meantime, the guerrilla outposts had engaged and halted a train with Italian reinforcements heading to the scene.[20] By 04:30, the entire attacking force, which had suffered only four wounded, had successfully disengaged and retreated to its assembly area.

Aftermath

The sabotage mission was a major success for SOE, being the biggest such operation carried out until then. Although its original military objective, the disruption of supplies for Field Marshal Rommel's troops, had been rendered obsolete by the Allied victory at El Alamein, it did display the potential for major guerrilla actions in serving Allied strategic objectives, encouraged SOE to aid the development of resistance movements, and provided a major morale boost for occupied Greece.[21] In its aftermath, the Harling mission was not withdrawn, as originally envisaged, but instructed to remain on spot and form the British Military Mission to Greece.[19] Unfortunately for the Greeks however, it was the last time where ELAS and EDES, the country's two major guerrilla forces, would cooperate militarily; within a month, the first clashes between ELAS and EDES forces occurred, a prelude of the open conflict that would erupt between ELAS and the other resistance groups in 1943, and a herald of the Greek Civil War.[7]

References

  1. ^ Clogg (1986), pp. 142–143
  2. ^ a b Papastratis (1984), p. 129
  3. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 3–4
  4. ^ Woodhouse (2002), p. xi
  5. ^ a b Woodhouse (2002), p. xii
  6. ^ Clogg (1986), pp. 140–141
  7. ^ a b c Clogg (1986), p. 143
  8. ^ McGlynn (1953), p. 4
  9. ^ Howarth (1980), p. 98
  10. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 4–5
  11. ^ Howarth (1980), pp. 98–99
  12. ^ McGlynn (1953), p. 9
  13. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 5–7
  14. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 7–8
  15. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 8–9
  16. ^ Woodhouse (2002), p. 33
  17. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 10–11
  18. ^ McGlynn (1953), pp. 11–12
  19. ^ a b Howarth (1980), p. 100
  20. ^ McGlynn (1953), p. 12
  21. ^ Woodhouse (2002), p. 26

Sources

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.